feeldb

Cinderella Man

2005 · 144 min · Director: Ron Howard ★ IMDb 8 · 211,616 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

During the Great Depression, common-man hero James J. Braddock (Russell Crowe), aka the Cinderella Man, was to become one of the most surprising sports legends in history. By the early 1930s, the impoverished ex-prizefighter was seemingly as broken-down, beaten-up, and out-of-luck as much of the rest of the American populace who had hit rock bottom. His career appeared to be finished, he was unable to pay the bills, his family--the only thing that mattered to him--was in danger, and he was even forced to go on Public Relief. But deep inside, James J. Braddock never relinquished his determination. Driven by love, honor, and an incredible dose of grit, he willed an impossible dream to come true. In a last-chance bid to help his family, Braddock returned to the ring. No one thought he had a shot. However Braddock, fueled by something beyond mere competition, kept winning. Suddenly, the ordinary working man became the mythic athlete. Carrying the hopes and dreams of the disenfranchised on his shoulders, Braddock rocketed through the ranks until this underdog chose to do the unthinkable: take on the heavyweight champ of the world, the unstoppable Max Baer (Craig Bierko), renowned for having killed two men in the ring.

Ask Kadri

Trailer for Cinderella Man

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Cinderella Man (2005) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Inspiration 30%, Love 25%, Sadness 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

  1. Love25%
  2. Relief10%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Inspiration, Love, Sadness. Genres: Drama, Romance, Biography. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Inspiration, Love and Sadness. Its IMDb rating of 8.0/10 suggests a strong audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 74/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Tension
  • Hope
  • Sadness

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Joy

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Dominant emotion: Tension

Dominant emotion: Relief

Dominant emotion: Hope

Tension
Hope
Sadness
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values. Not enough subtitle evidence
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 8 %, then peaks around 93 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityTensionHopeSadness
2.5 %≈ 4′Joy53 %27 %28 %10 %
7.5 %≈ 11′Sadness49 %30 %19 %24 %
12.5 %≈ 18′Tension55 %44 %10 %41 %
17.5 %≈ 25′Sadness65 %51 %8 %56 %
22.5 %≈ 32′Sadness70 %46 %11 %65 %
27.5 %≈ 40′Sadness71 %38 %24 %58 %
32.5 %≈ 47′Relief68 %39 %39 %30 %
37.5 %≈ 54′Tension70 %49 %49 %8 %
42.5 %≈ 61′Joy70 %44 %54 %5 %
47.5 %≈ 68′Hope63 %41 %54 %9 %
52.5 %≈ 76′Hope65 %55 %51 %16 %
57.5 %≈ 83′Tension69 %60 %44 %33 %
62.5 %≈ 90′Tension69 %60 %31 %39 %
67.5 %≈ 97′Tension73 %65 %28 %36 %
72.5 %≈ 104′Tension75 %66 %41 %34 %
77.5 %≈ 112′Hope78 %69 %54 %19 %
82.5 %≈ 119′Tension84 %79 %56 %9 %
87.5 %≈ 126′Tension89 %86 %61 %9 %
92.5 %≈ 133′Relief90 %87 %63 %5 %
97.5 %≈ 140′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
Cinderella

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about Cinderella Man. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Cinderella Man — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

Paul Giamatti

Joe Gould

Craig Bierko

Max Baer

Paddy Considine

Mike Wilson

Bruce McGill

Jimmy Johnston

DH
David Huband

Ford Bond

CP
Connor Price

Jay Braddock

AW
Ariel Waller

Rosemarie Braddock

PL
Patrick Louis

Howard Braddock

LK
Linda Kash

Lucille Gould

Nicholas Campbell

Sporty Lewis

GP
Gene Pyrz

Jake

CS
Chuck Shamata

Father Rorick

Ron Canada

Joe Jeanette

AJ
Alicia Johnston

Alice

TA
Troy Amos-Ross

John Henry Lewis

MS
Mark Simmons

Art Lasky

AB
Art Binkowski

Corn Griffin

Details

Directed by
Ron Howard
Written by
Akiva Goldsman, Cliff Hollingsworth, Akiva Goldsman
Type
Movies
Released
2005
Runtime
144 min
Country
United States
Ratings
★ IMDb 8 · 211,616 ratings
Feels mostly
Inspiration
Data updated

Where to watch

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.