Earthlings
2005 · 95 min · Director: Shaun Monson
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Using hidden cameras and never-before-seen footage, Earthlings chronicles the day-to-day practices of the largest industries in the world, all of which rely entirely on animals for profit.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Earthlings (2005) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Disgust 35%, Sadness 25%, Anger 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Disgust, Sadness, Anger. Genres: Documentary. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Disgust, Sadness and Anger. Its IMDb rating of 8.6/10 suggests a strong audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 75/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Disturbing
- Sadness
- Empathy
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion: Disgust
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Disturbing | Sadness | Empathy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Empathy | 48 % | 28 % | 23 % | 48 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Empathy | 56 % | 38 % | 36 % | 56 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Sadness | 66 % | 53 % | 55 % | 65 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 17′ | Sadness | 74 % | 66 % | 63 % | 68 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Disturbing | 83 % | 78 % | 65 % | 69 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 26′ | Disgust | 88 % | 84 % | 66 % | 69 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 31′ | Disturbing | 84 % | 81 % | 63 % | 66 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 36′ | Disturbing | 76 % | 73 % | 55 % | 58 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 40′ | Disturbing | 75 % | 70 % | 55 % | 55 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Sadness | 83 % | 78 % | 68 % | 70 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 50′ | Disturbing | 89 % | 85 % | 74 % | 78 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 55′ | Disgust | 86 % | 81 % | 69 % | 73 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 59′ | Empathy | 78 % | 71 % | 63 % | 69 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 64′ | Disturbing | 77 % | 71 % | 64 % | 70 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 69′ | Sadness | 81 % | 76 % | 68 % | 73 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Disturbing | 86 % | 81 % | 69 % | 74 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Disturbing | 84 % | 78 % | 66 % | 74 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Empathy | 73 % | 61 % | 56 % | 70 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Empathy | 68 % | 53 % | 50 % | 68 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 93′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Details
- Directed by
- Shaun Monson
- Written by
- Shaun Monson
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2005
- Runtime
- 95 min
- Country
- United States
- Genres
- Documentary
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Disgust
- Data updated
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.




