feeldb

Sex with Love

2003 · 108 min · Director: Boris Quercia ★ IMDb 6.2 · 2,802 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

In Santiago, Chile, the schoolteacher Luisa proposes a debate about sex with the parents of her students with the intention of giving classes about sex education to the youngsters. She is a young independent woman that is split between the love for her young mate, the painter Valentín, and for her experienced lover, the middle-age father of one of her students and successful writer Jorge. Jorge still lives with his wife Mónica, but their marriage ended and they do not even talk to each other, but his affair with Luisa is limited to sex and he doesn't seem to want a serious relationship. In the meeting, the parents are divided in groups, and Luisa stays with Jorge, and the couples womanizer Álvaro and his pregnant wife Elena and shy butcher Emilio and his frigid wife Maca. Álvaro is a wolf man, harasses all the beautiful women that he meets for one night stand, unfaithful and neglecting his wife at home. When Luisa finds that she is pregnant and Valentin is going to work in São Paulo, she makes a decision with her sentimental life. When Elena meets her former friend from university Carlos, Álvaro becomes jealous and tries to commit with her. When the liberated and independent niece Susan spends a couple of days in his home, the faithful Emilio is seduced by the sexy and gorgeous young girl, while Maca finds her sexuality, reading magazines and going to the gynecologist.

Ask Kadri Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Sex with Love (2003) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 30%, Love 25%, Confusion 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

30%Humor
25%Love
  1. Humor30%
  2. Love25%
  3. Joy15%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Love, Confusion. Genres: Comedy, Romance. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Love and Confusion. Its IMDb rating of 6.2/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 64/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Humor
  • Tension
  • Sympathy

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Humor

Dominant emotion: Tension

Dominant emotion: Sympathy

Humor
Tension
Sympathy
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values. Not enough subtitle evidence
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 3 %, then peaks around 33 %, then peaks around 78 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityHumorTensionSympathy
2.5 %≈ 3′Humor38 %33 %18 %13 %
7.5 %≈ 8′Humor44 %40 %23 %18 %
12.5 %≈ 14′Humor50 %46 %29 %24 %
17.5 %≈ 19′Humor53 %46 %35 %27 %
22.5 %≈ 24′Humor51 %46 %34 %26 %
27.5 %≈ 30′Humor54 %43 %36 %31 %
32.5 %≈ 35′Tension60 %30 %50 %43 %
37.5 %≈ 41′Sympathy55 %24 %49 %43 %
42.5 %≈ 46′Humor42 %28 %34 %30 %
47.5 %≈ 51′Humor40 %32 %30 %21 %
52.5 %≈ 57′Humor44 %38 %35 %20 %
57.5 %≈ 62′Humor44 %40 %34 %21 %
62.5 %≈ 68′Humor43 %38 %31 %21 %
67.5 %≈ 73′Tension48 %31 %43 %23 %
72.5 %≈ 78′Tension59 %24 %57 %35 %
77.5 %≈ 84′Tension65 %19 %56 %50 %
82.5 %≈ 89′Sympathy64 %23 %50 %50 %
87.5 %≈ 95′Tension61 %32 %50 %39 %
92.5 %≈ 100′Humor58 %38 %45 %32 %
97.5 %≈ 105′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
Riches to rags

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about Sex with Love. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Sex with Love — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

SA
Sigrid Alegría

ÁR
Álvaro Rudolphy

Álvaro

FP
Francisco Pérez-Bannen

MI
María Izquierdo

Maca

BQ
Boris Quercia

Emilio

CA
Cecilia Amenábar

Elena

JD
Javiera Díaz de Valdés

Susan

LV
Loreto Valenzuela

Monica

CO
Carolina Oliva

Eli

CG
Catalina Guerra

Angelica

NS
Natalie Soublette

Julia

BL
Berta Lasala

Patricia

JA
Jack Arama

Ginecologo

Luis Gnecco

Tomás

CM
Catherine Mazoyer

Sexy Nurse

TM
Teresa Münchmeyer

Nana Marta

GC
Gregory Cohen

Felipe

AB
Antonia Bravo

Alvaro's Secretary

EA
Evelyn Armijo

Elisa

Details

Directed by
Boris Quercia
Written by
Boris Quercia
Type
Movies
Released
2003
Runtime
108 min
Country
Chile
Ratings
★ IMDb 6.2 · 2,802 ratings
Feels mostly
Humor
Data updated

Where to watch

Also on

Availability varies by country

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.