One Missed Call
2003 · 112 min · Director: Takashi Miike, Takashi Miike
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
People mysteriously start receiving voicemail messages from their future selves, in the form of the sound of them reacting to their own violent deaths, along with the exact date and time of their future death, listed on the message log. The plot thickens as the surviving characters pursue the answers to this mystery which could save their lives.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
One Missed Call (2003) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Fear 35%, Tension 25%, Anxiety 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Fear35%
- Tension25%
- Anxiety20%
- Curiosity10%
- Disturbing10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Fear, Tension, Anxiety. Genres: Mystery, Horror. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Fear, Tension and Anxiety. Its IMDb rating of 6.2/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 65/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Disturbing
- Fear
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Disturbing | Fear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Curiosity | 37 % | 27 % | 17 % | 18 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Curiosity | 49 % | 39 % | 34 % | 29 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 14′ | Disturbing | 69 % | 61 % | 57 % | 53 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 20′ | Tension | 75 % | 73 % | 55 % | 64 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 25′ | Tension | 71 % | 70 % | 45 % | 59 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 31′ | Tension | 71 % | 64 % | 54 % | 50 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 36′ | Disturbing | 73 % | 57 % | 68 % | 41 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 42′ | Disturbing | 73 % | 60 % | 64 % | 40 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Tension | 76 % | 73 % | 51 % | 53 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Tension | 81 % | 80 % | 54 % | 68 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 59′ | Tension | 78 % | 71 % | 55 % | 64 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 64′ | Curiosity | 69 % | 55 % | 46 % | 45 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Sadness | 65 % | 47 % | 45 % | 33 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 76′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Tension | 82 % | 73 % | 58 % | 63 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 92′ | Sadness | 76 % | 63 % | 64 % | 51 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 98′ | Disturbing | 73 % | 63 % | 60 % | 49 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 104′ | Tension | 61 % | 45 % | 29 % | 34 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 109′ | Sadness | 52 % | 17 % | 5 % | 12 % |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Yoko Okazaki
Kenji Kawai
Ritsuko Yamashita
Mimiko Mizunuma
Details
- Directed by
- Takashi Miike, Takashi Miike
- Written by
- Yasushi Akimoto, Minako Daira
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2003
- Runtime
- 112 min
- Country
- Japan
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Fear
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
-
Philo
Opens in a new tab
-
AMC Plus Apple TV channel
Opens in a new tab
-
AMC+ Amazon Channel
Opens in a new tab
-
AMC+ Roku Premium Channel
Opens in a new tab
-
AMC+
Opens in a new tab
-
Shudder
Opens in a new tab
-
Shudder Amazon Channel
Opens in a new tab
-
Shudder Apple TV channel
Opens in a new tab
-
ARROW
Opens in a new tab
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





