Reconstruction
2003 · 92 min · Director: Christoffer Boe
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Late one evening, Alex suddenly abandons his girlfriend, Simone, to follow the beautiful Aimee. In his encounter with Aimee, time and place dissolve for him and he becomes a stranger to Simone, towards whom he cannot return. Alex's future, is Aimee's love. But will he have the courage to embrace it? A psychological romantic drama, about a man, who forgets about his past and must put his faith in love, in order to gain a future.
Emotional fingerprint
Reconstruction (2003) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Melancholy 35%, Love 25%, Confusion 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Melancholy35%
- Love25%
- Confusion20%
- Hope10%
- Curiosity10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Melancholy, Love, Confusion. Genres: Drama, Romance. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Melancholy, Love and Confusion. Its IMDb rating of 7.3/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 73/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Sadness
- Love
- Confusion
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Confusion
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Sadness | Love | Confusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Curiosity | 45 % | 27 % | 30 % | 23 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Love | 44 % | 23 % | 33 % | 24 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Love | 44 % | 25 % | 30 % | 19 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Sadness | 46 % | 31 % | 33 % | 18 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Love | 49 % | 25 % | 43 % | 26 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 25′ | Love | 49 % | 18 % | 46 % | 30 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 30′ | Love | 41 % | 16 % | 35 % | 21 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Curiosity | 40 % | 14 % | 19 % | 26 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Confusion | 54 % | 19 % | 15 % | 49 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Confusion | 66 % | 33 % | 16 % | 63 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Confusion | 65 % | 36 % | 18 % | 59 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Curiosity | 55 % | 21 % | 30 % | 39 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Love | 56 % | 13 % | 50 % | 24 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Love | 65 % | 26 % | 61 % | 24 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 67′ | Love | 65 % | 44 % | 51 % | 28 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Sadness | 66 % | 56 % | 36 % | 30 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 76′ | Sadness | 76 % | 70 % | 36 % | 33 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Sadness | 83 % | 78 % | 40 % | 40 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 85′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 90′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Reconstruction. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Mel David
Tryllekunstner
Monica
Nan Sand
Mercedes Sand
Waiter
Journalist
Bartender
Mrs. Banum
Details
- Directed by
- Christoffer Boe
- Written by
- Mogens Rukov, Christoffer Boe
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2003
- Runtime
- 92 min
- Country
- Denmark
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Melancholy
- Data updated
Where to watch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
