Soul Plane
2004 · 86 min · Director: Jessy Terrero
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Why just fly when you can soar with soul? After a humiliating experience on an airplane, Nashawn Wade sues the airline and is awarded a huge settlement. Determined to make good with the money, Nashawn creates the full service airline of his dreams, complete with sexy stewardesses, funky music, a hot onboard dance club, and a bathroom attendant. Departing from all-new Terminal X in Los Angeles, Soul Plane gives "fly" a whole new meaning taking its passengers on a maiden voyage full of comedy.
Emotional fingerprint
Soul Plane (2004) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 50%, Surprise 20%, Excitement 15%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor50%
- Surprise20%
- Excitement15%
- Satisfaction10%
- Love5%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Surprise, Excitement. Genres: Comedy. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Surprise and Excitement. Its IMDb rating of 4.6/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 56/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Relief
- Tension
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Relief | Tension |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Humor | 38 % | 35 % | 0 % | 13 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 6′ | Humor | 53 % | 50 % | 9 % | 19 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Humor | 59 % | 56 % | 18 % | 16 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Humor | 57 % | 56 % | 9 % | 15 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Humor | 55 % | 55 % | 3 % | 18 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 24′ | Humor | 51 % | 51 % | 8 % | 18 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Humor | 50 % | 49 % | 8 % | 19 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Humor | 53 % | 50 % | 3 % | 21 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 37′ | Humor | 57 % | 56 % | 0 % | 25 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 41′ | Humor | 60 % | 60 % | 0 % | 24 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Humor | 59 % | 59 % | 0 % | 15 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 49′ | Humor | 58 % | 55 % | 0 % | 15 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 54′ | Humor | 56 % | 50 % | 5 % | 23 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Humor | 55 % | 44 % | 16 % | 19 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Love | 60 % | 43 % | 18 % | 24 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 67′ | Tension | 66 % | 49 % | 9 % | 49 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Tension | 69 % | 53 % | 20 % | 64 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 75′ | Relief | 71 % | 55 % | 49 % | 53 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 80′ | Relief | 72 % | 58 % | 63 % | 30 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 84′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Shaniece
Cherry
Riggs
Tamika
Judge Pong
Details
- Directed by
- Jessy Terrero
- Written by
- Bo Zenga, Chuck Wilson
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2004
- Runtime
- 86 min
- Country
- United States
- Genres
- Comedy
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
