Baadasssss!
2003 · 108 min · Director: Mario Van Peebles
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Melvin Van Peebles stunned the world for the first time, with his debut feature, The Story of a Three Day Pass. Filmed in France and selected as the French entry in the San Francisco Film Festival, Melvin's film was awarded the top prize. Saying it was controversial would be an understatement. In 1968 for a black man to walk up to the podium and accept the top festival award for a film he had to go abroad to make--now that's how you make your mark. After his comedy, Watermelon Man, Melvin was determined to push the Hollywood boundaries with the groundbreaking, and even more controversial, Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song. Turned down by every major studio including Columbia, where he had a three-picture deal, Melvin was forced to basically self-finance. Risking everything he had, Melvin delivered to the world the first Black Ghetto hero on the big screen--whether they were ready or not. More than 30 years later, history is being fashioned again in the telling of this very tale. Mario Van Peebles, Melvin's son, directs an honest and revealing portrait of his pioneering father. Mario now tells the story of the making of Melvin Van Peebles' landmark 1971 film, Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song, including Melvin's struggles to raise money to fund the film under the guise of creating a black porno film. Melvin had ducked creditors, the unions and had to bail out his camera crew after they were arrested because a white cop decided a bunch of Negroes and hippies couldn't have come by that camera equipment honestly. Despite death threats and temporarily losing sight in one eye, Melvin somehow managed to whip into shape a rag-tag, multi-racial crew and finish the film that would give birth to birth of a new era which was about to explode: Independent Black Cinema.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Baadasssss! (2003) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Inspiration 35%, Empathy 20%, Awe 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Inspiration35%
- Empathy20%
- Awe20%
- Anger15%
- Curiosity10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Inspiration, Empathy, Awe. Genres: Drama, Biography. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Inspiration, Empathy and Awe. Its IMDb rating of 7.3/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 71/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Hope
- Tension
- Joy
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Joy
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Hope | Tension | Joy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Hope | 47 % | 32 % | 33 % | 8 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Hope | 49 % | 39 % | 31 % | 13 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 14′ | Hope | 48 % | 40 % | 27 % | 14 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Hope | 44 % | 38 % | 25 % | 15 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 24′ | Hope | 45 % | 38 % | 28 % | 24 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 30′ | Humor | 48 % | 34 % | 31 % | 25 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Humor | 50 % | 29 % | 40 % | 14 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 41′ | Tension | 55 % | 33 % | 50 % | 13 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 46′ | Hope | 54 % | 38 % | 48 % | 18 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Humor | 51 % | 30 % | 43 % | 13 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Empathy | 54 % | 23 % | 44 % | 9 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Tension | 56 % | 28 % | 50 % | 13 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Tension | 59 % | 38 % | 55 % | 18 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Hope | 61 % | 40 % | 55 % | 20 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Tension | 65 % | 30 % | 60 % | 16 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 84′ | Tension | 65 % | 24 % | 63 % | 11 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 89′ | Tension | 60 % | 29 % | 56 % | 10 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 95′ | Tension | 61 % | 36 % | 56 % | 16 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 100′ | Tension | 71 % | 48 % | 51 % | 39 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 105′ | Joy | 78 % | 58 % | 33 % | 62 % |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Baadasssss!. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Kadri
Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Baadasssss! — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.
Premise onlyAfterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Ginnie
Details
- Directed by
- Mario Van Peebles
- Written by
- Mario Van Peebles, Melvin Van Peebles, Dennis Haggerty
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2003
- Runtime
- 108 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Inspiration
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





