feeldb

The Interpreter

2005 · 128 min · Director: Sydney Pollack ★ IMDb 6.4 · 117,211 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

Escalating events begin when U.N. interpreter Silvia Broome alleges that she has overheard a death threat against an African head of state, spoken in a rare dialect few people other than Silvia can understand. With the words "The Teacher will never leave this room alive," in an instant, Silvia's life is turned upside down as she becomes a hunted target of the killers. Placed under the protection of federal agent Tobin Keller, Silvia's world only grows more nightmarish. As Keller digs deeper into his eyewitnesses' past and her secretive world of global connections, the more suspicious he becomes that she herself might be involved in the conspiracy. With every step of the way, he finds more reasons to mistrust her. Is Sylvia a victim? A suspect? Or something else entirely? And can Tobin, coping with his own personal heartache, keep her safe? Though they must depend on one another, Silvia and Tobin couldn't be more different. Silvia's strengths are words, diplomacy and the subtleties of meaning, while Tobin is all about instinct, action and reading into the most primal human behaviors. Now, as the danger of a major assassination on U.S. soil grows and Silvia's life hangs in the balance, Silvia and Tobin play out a gripping dance of evasion and revelation that keeps them both guessing as they race to stop a terrifying international crisis before it's too late.

Ask Kadri

Trailer for The Interpreter

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

The Interpreter (2005) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Anxiety 30%, Anticipation 25%, Confusion 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Anxiety, Anticipation, Confusion. Genres: Thriller, Mystery, Crime. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Anxiety, Anticipation and Confusion. Its IMDb rating of 6.4/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 67/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Tension
  • Sadness
  • Empathy

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Tension

Dominant emotion: Curiosity

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Dominant emotion: Empathy

Tension
Sadness
Empathy
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values.
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 23 %, then rises around 53 %, then peaks around 88 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityTensionSadnessEmpathy
2.5 %≈ 3′Tension57 %57 %17 %15 %
7.5 %≈ 10′Tension53 %53 %11 %11 %
12.5 %≈ 16′Tension55 %51 %11 %11 %
17.5 %≈ 22′Curiosity54 %44 %10 %11 %
22.5 %≈ 29′Curiosity49 %36 %9 %11 %
27.5 %≈ 35′Curiosity51 %38 %23 %24 %
32.5 %≈ 42′Sadness60 %41 %49 %48 %
37.5 %≈ 48′Sadness63 %40 %59 %58 %
42.5 %≈ 54′Sadness60 %43 %53 %51 %
47.5 %≈ 61′Sadness63 %49 %54 %51 %
52.5 %≈ 67′Sadness69 %56 %50 %51 %
57.5 %≈ 74′Tension78 %66 %48 %51 %
62.5 %≈ 80′Sadness83 %56 %66 %65 %
67.5 %≈ 86′Sadness80 %45 %68 %70 %
72.5 %≈ 93′Tension74 %56 %41 %54 %
77.5 %≈ 99′Curiosity71 %68 %25 %34 %
82.5 %≈ 106′Tension78 %76 %28 %31 %
87.5 %≈ 112′Tension85 %80 %49 %53 %
92.5 %≈ 118′Sadness83 %57 %68 %70 %
97.5 %≈ 125′Empathy73 %27 %65 %70 %
Man in a hole

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about The Interpreter. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about The Interpreter — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

Yvan Attal

Philippe

EC
Earl Cameron

Zuwanie

GH
George Harris

Kuman-Kuman

MW
Michael Wright

Marcus

Clyde Kusatsu

Police Chief Lee Wu

Eric Keenleyside

Rory Robb

HS
Hugo Speer

Simon Broome

MJ
Maz Jobrani

Mo

YG
Yusuf Gatewood

Doug

CC
Curtiss Cook

Ajene Xola

BU
Byron Utley

Jean Gamba

Robert Clohessy

FBI Agent King

TS
Terry Serpico

FBI Agent Lewis

DF
David Fonteno

Phillip Ostroff

JK
John Knox

Fred Jameson

David Zayas

Charlie Russell

Details

Directed by
Sydney Pollack
Type
Movies
Released
2005
Runtime
128 min
Country
United Kingdom, France, Germany, United States
Ratings
★ IMDb 6.4 · 117,211 ratings
Feels mostly
Anxiety
Data updated

Where to watch

Also on

Availability varies by country

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.