Enduring Love
2004 · 100 min · Director: Roger Michell
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
On a beautiful cloudless day a young couple celebrate their reunion with a picnic. Joe has planned a postcard-perfect afternoon in the English countryside with his partner, Claire. But as Joe and Claire prepare to open a bottle of champagne, their idyll comes to an abrupt end. A hot air balloon drifts into the field, obviously in trouble. The pilot catches his leg in the anchor rope, while the only passenger, a boy, is too scared to jump down. Joe and three other men rush to secure the basket. Just as they secure the balloon, the wind rushes into the field, and at once the rescuers are airborne. Joe manages to drop to the ground, as do most of his companions, but one man is lifted skywards. As Joe, Claire and the other rescuers watch this strangely beautiful sight, they see the man fall to his death. Recalling the day's events at dinner with his friends Robin and Rachel, Joe reveals the impact the accident has had on his battered psyche. Ironically the balloon eventually lands safely, the boy unscathed. But fate has far more unpleasant things in store for Joe. Going to retrieve the body of the fallen man with fellow rescuer Jed Parry, for example, turns out to be a very bad move. Jed feels an instant connection with Joe--one that, as the weeks go by, becomes ever more intense.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Enduring Love (2004) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Anxiety 30%, Tension 22%, Empathy 18%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Anxiety, Tension, Empathy. Genres: Drama, Romance, Mystery. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Anxiety, Tension and Empathy. Its IMDb rating of 6.3/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 64/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Disturbing
- Sadness
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Disturbing | Sadness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Tension | 82 % | 68 % | 38 % | 27 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Sadness | 75 % | 48 % | 40 % | 51 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Sadness | 63 % | 35 % | 30 % | 50 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Curiosity | 50 % | 36 % | 25 % | 24 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Curiosity | 48 % | 39 % | 28 % | 20 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Love | 53 % | 44 % | 30 % | 30 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Tension | 60 % | 49 % | 36 % | 40 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Sadness | 66 % | 44 % | 33 % | 45 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Love | 65 % | 41 % | 30 % | 29 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Curiosity | 65 % | 51 % | 49 % | 23 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Disturbing | 69 % | 59 % | 61 % | 36 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Tension | 71 % | 64 % | 60 % | 35 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Curiosity | 76 % | 71 % | 66 % | 32 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Disturbing | 83 % | 76 % | 76 % | 50 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Disturbing | 86 % | 79 % | 79 % | 59 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Tension | 89 % | 84 % | 79 % | 49 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Tension | 84 % | 71 % | 65 % | 45 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Sadness | 73 % | 43 % | 38 % | 50 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 93′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 98′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Cinderella
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Enduring Love. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Kadri
Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Enduring Love — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.
Premise onlyAfterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Grandfather
Boy in Balloon
John Logan
Farmer
Natasha
Katie Logan (as Rosanna Michell)
Katie's Friend
Robin & Rachel's Child
Robin & Rachel's Child
Details
- Directed by
- Roger Michell
- Written by
- Ian McEwan, Joe Penhall
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2004
- Runtime
- 100 min
- Country
- United Kingdom, France, United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Anxiety
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





