Night of the Living Dorks
2004 · 90 min · Director: Matthias Dinter
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
The school friends Philip, Wurst and Konrad are high-school losers: Philip desires the sexy Uschi, an easy girl for successful boys; the complex Konrad lists all the humiliations he has been submitted in school; and Wurst only cares to dope himself and smoke pot. Philip's next door gothic neighbor Rebecca has a non-corresponded crush on Philip. When Rebecca performs an ancient voodoo ritual in the cemetery with her friends, Philip and his friends arrive, mocking the ceremony and are accidentally blasted with zombie ashes from Haiti. Then, while driving his van, Wurst smokes marijuana but he has a car accident and the trio dies. However, they awake in the morgue and sooner they realize that they have become zombies. While seeking an antidote in the Necronomicon, Konrad, Wurst and Philip find the advantages of being zombies, becoming successful due to their recently acquired strength.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Night of the Living Dorks (2004) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 35%, Disgust 25%, Fear 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor35%
- Disgust25%
- Fear20%
- Excitement10%
- Smile10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Disgust, Fear. Genres: Comedy, Horror. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Disgust and Fear. Its IMDb rating of 5.6/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 61/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Tension
- Relief
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Tension | Relief |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Humor | 47 % | 43 % | 25 % | 0 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Humor | 49 % | 46 % | 23 % | 0 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Humor | 53 % | 50 % | 26 % | 0 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Humor | 59 % | 56 % | 32 % | 3 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 20′ | Humor | 63 % | 59 % | 35 % | 5 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 25′ | Humor | 61 % | 53 % | 38 % | 3 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Tension | 60 % | 48 % | 41 % | 4 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Humor | 59 % | 50 % | 40 % | 10 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Humor | 55 % | 51 % | 34 % | 9 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Humor | 54 % | 53 % | 28 % | 3 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 47′ | Humor | 55 % | 55 % | 25 % | 0 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 52′ | Humor | 54 % | 49 % | 30 % | 1 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Tension | 55 % | 44 % | 41 % | 4 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Humor | 61 % | 49 % | 51 % | 4 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Tension | 65 % | 49 % | 57 % | 3 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Tension | 64 % | 46 % | 56 % | 15 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Relief | 65 % | 51 % | 55 % | 30 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 79′ | Tension | 70 % | 54 % | 57 % | 38 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Relief | 73 % | 52 % | 55 % | 52 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Cinderella
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Night of the Living Dorks. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Kadri
Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Night of the Living Dorks — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.
Premise onlyAfterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Rebecca
Wolf
Uschi
Frau Fleischhacker
Herr Fleischhacker
Frau Niedermacher
Krankenschwester
Gunther
Zivi 2
Medizinstudent
Kind Haiti-Familie
Susi
Reiches Mädel
Heisse Braut
Party-Mädel
Details
- Directed by
- Matthias Dinter
- Written by
- Matthias Dinter
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2004
- Runtime
- 90 min
- Country
- Germany
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





