Trailer Park Boys
1999 · 67 min · Director: Mike Clattenburg
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Two petty felons have a documentary made about their life in a trailer park.
Emotional fingerprint
Trailer Park Boys (1999) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 45%, Smile 20%, Empathy 15%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor45%
- Smile20%
- Empathy15%
- Nostalgia10%
- Satisfaction10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Smile, Empathy. Genres: Comedy. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Smile and Empathy. Its IMDb rating of 7.9/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 73/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Tension
- Disturbing
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Tension | Disturbing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Humor | 30 % | 27 % | 13 % | 7 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 5′ | Humor | 38 % | 36 % | 19 % | 9 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Humor | 45 % | 42 % | 23 % | 17 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Humor | 50 % | 46 % | 23 % | 25 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Humor | 46 % | 44 % | 23 % | 20 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Humor | 41 % | 39 % | 22 % | 12 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 22′ | Humor | 44 % | 44 % | 22 % | 11 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 25′ | Humor | 47 % | 46 % | 25 % | 16 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Humor | 49 % | 40 % | 32 % | 29 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Disturbing | 55 % | 37 % | 40 % | 45 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Disturbing | 64 % | 39 % | 50 % | 57 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Disturbing | 63 % | 44 % | 49 % | 52 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 42′ | Humor | 54 % | 48 % | 35 % | 30 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Humor | 51 % | 50 % | 28 % | 15 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 49′ | Humor | 57 % | 47 % | 28 % | 26 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 52′ | Disturbing | 58 % | 37 % | 21 % | 38 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 55′ | Humor | 55 % | 32 % | 29 % | 32 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 59′ | Tension | 66 % | 33 % | 56 % | 39 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Tension | 68 % | 36 % | 58 % | 41 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Humor | 55 % | 37 % | 33 % | 27 % |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Trailer Park Boys. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Trinity
Trevor
Cory
Cop #1
Cop #2
Camerman (as Art Canning)
Dick #1
Dick #2
Motorcycle Dick
Details
- Directed by
- Mike Clattenburg
- Written by
- Mike Clattenburg, John Paul Tremblay, Robb Wells, Robb Wells
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1999
- Runtime
- 67 min
- Country
- Canada
- Genres
- Comedy
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
