feeldb

Inside Deep Throat

2005 · 90 min · Director: Fenton Bailey, Randy Barbato ★ IMDb 6.7 · 7,282 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

In 1972, a seemingly typical shoestring budget pornographic film was made in a Florida hotel, "Deep Throat," starring Linda Lovelace. This film would surpass the wildest expectation of everyone involved to become one of the most successful independent films of all time. It caught the public imagination which met the spirit of the times, even as the self appointed guardians of public morality struggled to suppress it, and created, for a brief moment, a possible future where sexuality in film had a bold artistic potential. This film covers the story of the making of this controversial film, its stunning success, its hysterical opposition along with its dark side of mob influence and allegations of the on set mistreatment of the film's star. In short, the combined events would redefine the popular appeal of pornography, even as more cynical developments would lead it down other paths.

Ask Kadri

Trailer for Inside Deep Throat

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Inside Deep Throat (2005) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Curiosity 30%, Confusion 22%, Sadness 18%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

  1. Awe15%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Curiosity, Confusion, Sadness. Genres: History, Documentary, Biography. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Curiosity, Confusion and Sadness. Its IMDb rating of 6.7/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 67/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Curiosity
  • Sadness
  • Disturbing

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Curiosity

Dominant emotion: Humor

Dominant emotion: Tension

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Dominant emotion: Disturbing

Curiosity
Sadness
Disturbing
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values. Not enough subtitle evidence
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity peaks around 63 %, then peaks around 78 %, then dips around 93 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityCuriositySadnessDisturbing
2.5 %≈ 2′Curiosity48 %53 %3 %7 %
7.5 %≈ 7′Curiosity48 %51 %5 %10 %
12.5 %≈ 11′Curiosity49 %51 %4 %14 %
17.5 %≈ 16′Curiosity50 %51 %3 %13 %
22.5 %≈ 20′Humor49 %49 %3 %9 %
27.5 %≈ 25′Curiosity48 %49 %3 %9 %
32.5 %≈ 29′Curiosity50 %50 %1 %9 %
37.5 %≈ 34′Humor51 %50 %8 %9 %
42.5 %≈ 38′Curiosity50 %50 %19 %16 %
47.5 %≈ 43′Curiosity51 %50 %18 %26 %
52.5 %≈ 47′Curiosity54 %50 %10 %34 %
57.5 %≈ 52′Tension59 %49 %11 %39 %
62.5 %≈ 56′Tension64 %45 %24 %38 %
67.5 %≈ 61′Tension61 %40 %38 %34 %
72.5 %≈ 65′Sadness63 %36 %50 %45 %
77.5 %≈ 70′Disturbing70 %34 %60 %57 %
82.5 %≈ 74′Sadness65 %32 %57 %43 %
87.5 %≈ 79′Sadness53 %29 %39 %20 %
92.5 %≈ 83′Humor45 %22 %17 %8 %
97.5 %≈ 88′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
Riches to rags

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about Inside Deep Throat. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Inside Deep Throat — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

LL
Linda Lovelace

Dennis Hopper

Narrator (voice)

PB
Peter Bart

Self

HR
Harry Reems

Warren Beatty

Self (archive footage)

CB
Carl Bernstein

Self

NM
Norman Mailer

Self

GV
Gore Vidal

Self

HH
Hugh Hefner

Self

CP
Camille Paglia

Self

HG
Helen Gurley Brown

Self

EJ
Erica Jong

Self

RW
Ruth Westheimer

Self

DC
Dick Cavett

Self

BM
Bill Maher

Self

CK
Charles Keating

Self

LP
Larry Parrish

Self

RN
Richard Nixon

Self (archive footage)

AG
Al Goldstein

Self

Details

Directed by
Fenton Bailey, Randy Barbato
Written by
Fenton Bailey, Randy Barbato
Type
Movies
Released
2005
Runtime
90 min
Country
United States
Ratings
★ IMDb 6.7 · 7,282 ratings
Feels mostly
Curiosity
Data updated

Where to watch

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.