feeldb

Employee of the Month

2006 · 103 min · Director: Greg Coolidge ★ IMDb 5.6 · 53,716 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

Slacker Zack Bradley works as a box boy at Super Club, a warehouse club store. It is the lowest in the job hierarchy at the store. He doesn't work very hard at his job, and along with some of his fellow employee friends treats the store like his playground. Regardless, he is well liked by most of the other employees. He used to be hard working, when he was developing a dot com, but he lost all his and his grandmother's money in the process. As such, he decided not to take any risks in life while he now lives with her so as to provide her with what he considers at least a more reliable life. On the other extreme is Vince Downey, who lords an air of superiority over his fellow employees as the store's head cashier. He lives to be the store's best employee solely so that he can be named Employee of the Month, which he has been named seventeen months in a row. If he is named Employee of the Month for a record eighteenth time in a row, he will be rewarded with entrance into the corporation's management track program and a new car. Zack decides he wants to break Vince's streak if only because he reads in the employment record of recent transfer, the pretty Amy Renfro, that she had a thing at her previous store for men who have been named Employee of the Month. Zack finds that working toward being Employee of the Month is not as easy as he thought, especially as Vince will not relinquish the title and all its perks without a fight, dirty or not. Zack has to decide how far he is willing to go to get the title and the girl.

Ask Kadri

Trailer for Employee of the Month

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Employee of the Month (2006) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 35%, Joy 25%, Excitement 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

35%Humor
25%Joy
  1. Humor35%
  2. Joy25%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Joy, Excitement. Genres: Comedy, Romance. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Joy and Excitement. Its IMDb rating of 5.6/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 59/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Humor
  • Joy
  • Tension

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Humor

Dominant emotion: Joy

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Dominant emotion: Tension

Humor
Joy
Tension
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values.
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 8 %, then peaks around 98 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityHumorJoyTension
2.5 %≈ 3′Humor34 %33 %12 %9 %
7.5 %≈ 8′Humor34 %32 %12 %11 %
12.5 %≈ 13′Humor37 %35 %13 %14 %
17.5 %≈ 18′Humor41 %39 %16 %20 %
22.5 %≈ 23′Humor43 %41 %19 %21 %
27.5 %≈ 28′Humor44 %43 %20 %18 %
32.5 %≈ 33′Humor43 %41 %22 %20 %
37.5 %≈ 39′Joy41 %38 %26 %19 %
42.5 %≈ 44′Humor44 %40 %25 %19 %
47.5 %≈ 49′Humor44 %40 %19 %23 %
52.5 %≈ 54′Humor40 %36 %13 %24 %
57.5 %≈ 59′Humor39 %35 %12 %28 %
62.5 %≈ 64′Humor43 %36 %13 %36 %
67.5 %≈ 70′Humor46 %37 %14 %41 %
72.5 %≈ 75′Humor47 %37 %22 %40 %
77.5 %≈ 80′Joy49 %33 %24 %38 %
82.5 %≈ 85′Sadness52 %30 %18 %37 %
87.5 %≈ 90′Sadness55 %31 %22 %41 %
92.5 %≈ 95′Tension61 %35 %36 %46 %
97.5 %≈ 100′Joy64 %39 %50 %43 %
Cinderella

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about Employee of the Month. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Employee of the Month — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

TB
Tim Bagley

Glen Gary

Danny Woodburn

Glen Ross

BD
Barbara Dodd

Granny

VI
Victor Izay

Greeter

MM
Marc Mouchet

Gene

KA
Kathleen Arc

Grumpy Lady

AC
Adriana Cordova

Checker #2

JG
Jenny Gabrielle

Checker #3

ES
Emily Sandberg

Young Mom

CR
Cece Renn

Young Hot Mom

SB
Susse Budde

Lost Kid's Mom

Details

Directed by
Greg Coolidge
Written by
Greg Coolidge, Don Calame, Chris Conroy
Type
Movies
Released
2006
Runtime
103 min
Country
United States
Ratings
★ IMDb 5.6 · 53,716 ratings
Feels mostly
Humor
Data updated

Where to watch

Also on

Availability varies by country

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.