Murderous Intent
2006 · 110 min · Director: Gregory Read, Gregory J. Read
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
The forensic psychiatric Sally Rowe is called by Detective Martin Mackenzie to analyze the profile of the teenager Alex Forbes, who was found in a train station holding the body of his schoolmate Nigel Colby and with powder in his hand. Alex discloses his relationship with Nigel, who believes that they were descendants of the Templar Knights, and how Nigel used the power of his mind to control him. Mackenzie believes that Alex is the killer, but Susan investigates the family of Nigel under pressure of Alex's father, and finds that all of them belong to an ancient and powerful secret society.
Emotional fingerprint
Murderous Intent (2006) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Confusion 30%, Tension 25%, Fear 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Confusion30%
- Tension25%
- Fear20%
- Anxiety15%
- Disturbing10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Confusion, Tension, Fear. Genres: Mystery, Crime, Horror. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Confusion, Tension and Fear. Its IMDb rating of 6.3/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 65/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Curiosity
- Disturbing
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Curiosity | Disturbing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Curiosity | 53 % | 43 % | 55 % | 38 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Curiosity | 52 % | 42 % | 53 % | 33 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 14′ | Curiosity | 57 % | 51 % | 57 % | 32 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Curiosity | 56 % | 52 % | 53 % | 31 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 25′ | Curiosity | 50 % | 45 % | 44 % | 28 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 30′ | Tension | 50 % | 43 % | 43 % | 31 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 36′ | Curiosity | 50 % | 38 % | 46 % | 35 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 41′ | Disturbing | 55 % | 44 % | 49 % | 41 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 47′ | Tension | 59 % | 52 % | 54 % | 40 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 52′ | Curiosity | 58 % | 49 % | 57 % | 37 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Tension | 62 % | 56 % | 58 % | 46 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Tension | 68 % | 66 % | 61 % | 55 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 69′ | Curiosity | 74 % | 69 % | 62 % | 65 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Disturbing | 76 % | 69 % | 60 % | 69 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 80′ | Curiosity | 73 % | 67 % | 59 % | 61 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 85′ | Sadness | 80 % | 74 % | 58 % | 69 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 91′ | Tension | 85 % | 79 % | 57 % | 80 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 96′ | Disturbing | 79 % | 71 % | 59 % | 77 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 102′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 107′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Murderous Intent. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Josh
Helen Colbie
Rev Donaldson
Mr Fergus
Mr Evans
Police Bureaucrat
Coroner
Boy on Train
Details
- Directed by
- Gregory Read, Gregory J. Read
- Written by
- Gregory Read, Gregory J. Read
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2006
- Runtime
- 110 min
- Country
- Australia, United Kingdom
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Confusion
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Free
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
