21
2008 · 123 min · Director: Robert Luketic
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Ben Campbell is a young, highly intelligent, student at M.I.T. in Boston who strives to succeed. Wanting a scholarship to transfer to Harvard School of Medicine with the desire to become a doctor, Ben learns that he cannot afford the $300,000 for the four to five years of schooling as he comes from a poor, working-class background. But one evening, Ben is introduced by his unorthodox math professor Micky Rosa into a small but secretive club of five. Students Jill, Choi, Kianna, and Fisher, who are being trained by Professor Rosa of the skill of card counting at blackjack. Intrigued by the desire to make money, Ben joins his new friends on secret weekend trips to Las Vegas where, using their skills of code talk and hand signals, they have Ben make hundreds of thousands of dollars in winning blackjack at casino after casino. Ben only wants to make enough money for the tuition to Harvard and then back out. But as fellow card counter, Jill Taylor, predicts, Ben becomes corrupted by greed and his arrogance at winning which lets his feelings get in the way, and it also puts Professor Rosa, as well as the group, on the radar of a brutal casino security enforcer, named Cole Williams, who holds a personal grudge of some kind against Rosa which threatens to undo everything the students have learned and earned.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
21 (2008) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Excitement 30%, Curiosity 25%, Anxiety 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Excitement30%
- Curiosity25%
- Anxiety20%
- Humor15%
- Satisfaction10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Excitement, Curiosity, Anxiety. Genres: Thriller, Drama, Crime. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Excitement, Curiosity and Anxiety. Its IMDb rating of 6.8/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 70/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Excitement
- Curiosity
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Joy
Dominant emotion: Excitement
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Excitement | Curiosity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Curiosity | 38 % | 16 % | 26 % | 33 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 9′ | Joy | 38 % | 13 % | 22 % | 30 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Curiosity | 42 % | 13 % | 22 % | 39 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 22′ | Curiosity | 47 % | 24 % | 26 % | 48 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Curiosity | 50 % | 37 % | 31 % | 45 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Excitement | 48 % | 38 % | 36 % | 39 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 40′ | Excitement | 46 % | 32 % | 40 % | 34 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 46′ | Excitement | 47 % | 31 % | 39 % | 30 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 52′ | Joy | 42 % | 30 % | 28 % | 27 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Joy | 42 % | 30 % | 28 % | 26 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Excitement | 51 % | 37 % | 42 % | 26 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Excitement | 57 % | 46 % | 44 % | 24 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 77′ | Tension | 61 % | 55 % | 31 % | 20 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Tension | 63 % | 61 % | 23 % | 20 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 89′ | Tension | 67 % | 65 % | 22 % | 27 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 95′ | Tension | 73 % | 65 % | 19 % | 32 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 101′ | Sadness | 73 % | 54 % | 28 % | 32 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 108′ | Excitement | 71 % | 55 % | 49 % | 36 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 114′ | Tension | 66 % | 50 % | 46 % | 38 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 120′ | Joy | 55 % | 28 % | 30 % | 31 % |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about 21. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Kadri
Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about 21 — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.
Premise onlyAfterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Fisher
Cam
Kartengeber
Planet Hollywood Dealer
Planet Hollywood Dealer
Red Rock Dealer
Red Rock Dealer
Red Rock Dealer
Red Rock Doorman
Red Rock Host
Details
- Directed by
- Robert Luketic
- Written by
- Peter Steinfeld, Allan Loeb, Ben Mezrich
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2008
- Runtime
- 123 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Excitement
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





