feeldb

21

2008 · 123 min · Director: Robert Luketic ★ IMDb 6.8 · 283,598 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

Ben Campbell is a young, highly intelligent, student at M.I.T. in Boston who strives to succeed. Wanting a scholarship to transfer to Harvard School of Medicine with the desire to become a doctor, Ben learns that he cannot afford the $300,000 for the four to five years of schooling as he comes from a poor, working-class background. But one evening, Ben is introduced by his unorthodox math professor Micky Rosa into a small but secretive club of five. Students Jill, Choi, Kianna, and Fisher, who are being trained by Professor Rosa of the skill of card counting at blackjack. Intrigued by the desire to make money, Ben joins his new friends on secret weekend trips to Las Vegas where, using their skills of code talk and hand signals, they have Ben make hundreds of thousands of dollars in winning blackjack at casino after casino. Ben only wants to make enough money for the tuition to Harvard and then back out. But as fellow card counter, Jill Taylor, predicts, Ben becomes corrupted by greed and his arrogance at winning which lets his feelings get in the way, and it also puts Professor Rosa, as well as the group, on the radar of a brutal casino security enforcer, named Cole Williams, who holds a personal grudge of some kind against Rosa which threatens to undo everything the students have learned and earned.

Ask Kadri

Trailer for 21

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

21 (2008) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Excitement 30%, Curiosity 25%, Anxiety 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

  1. Humor15%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Excitement, Curiosity, Anxiety. Genres: Thriller, Drama, Crime. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Excitement, Curiosity and Anxiety. Its IMDb rating of 6.8/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 70/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Tension
  • Excitement
  • Curiosity

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Curiosity

Dominant emotion: Joy

Dominant emotion: Excitement

Dominant emotion: Tension

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Tension
Excitement
Curiosity
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values.
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 8 %, then peaks around 78 %, then dips around 98 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityTensionExcitementCuriosity
2.5 %≈ 3′Curiosity38 %16 %26 %33 %
7.5 %≈ 9′Joy38 %13 %22 %30 %
12.5 %≈ 15′Curiosity42 %13 %22 %39 %
17.5 %≈ 22′Curiosity47 %24 %26 %48 %
22.5 %≈ 28′Curiosity50 %37 %31 %45 %
27.5 %≈ 34′Excitement48 %38 %36 %39 %
32.5 %≈ 40′Excitement46 %32 %40 %34 %
37.5 %≈ 46′Excitement47 %31 %39 %30 %
42.5 %≈ 52′Joy42 %30 %28 %27 %
47.5 %≈ 58′Joy42 %30 %28 %26 %
52.5 %≈ 65′Excitement51 %37 %42 %26 %
57.5 %≈ 71′Excitement57 %46 %44 %24 %
62.5 %≈ 77′Tension61 %55 %31 %20 %
67.5 %≈ 83′Tension63 %61 %23 %20 %
72.5 %≈ 89′Tension67 %65 %22 %27 %
77.5 %≈ 95′Tension73 %65 %19 %32 %
82.5 %≈ 101′Sadness73 %54 %28 %32 %
87.5 %≈ 108′Excitement71 %55 %49 %36 %
92.5 %≈ 114′Tension66 %50 %46 %38 %
97.5 %≈ 120′Joy55 %28 %30 %31 %
Riches to rags

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about 21. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about 21 — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

Aaron Yoo

Choi

LL
Liza Lapira

Kianna

JP
Jacob Pitts

Fisher

Laurence Fishburne

Cole Williams

Jack McGee

Terry

Josh Gad

Miles

SG
Sam Golzari

Cam

HC
Helen Carey

Ellen Campbell

Jack Gilpin

Bob Phillips

BC
Ben Campbell

Kartengeber

DL
Donna Lows

Planet Hollywood Dealer

BW
Butch Williams

Planet Hollywood Dealer

SR
Steven Richard Vezina

Red Rock Dealer

CT
Chaska T. Werner

Red Rock Dealer

KM
Kyle Morris

Red Rock Dealer

EM
Ernell Manabat

Red Rock Doorman

FD
Frank DeAngelo

Red Rock Host

Details

Directed by
Robert Luketic
Written by
Peter Steinfeld, Allan Loeb, Ben Mezrich
Type
Movies
Released
2008
Runtime
123 min
Country
United States
Ratings
★ IMDb 6.8 · 283,598 ratings
Feels mostly
Excitement
Data updated

Where to watch

Also on

Availability varies by country

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.