Hura gâru
2006 · 121 min · Director: Sang-il Lee
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
In 1965 the planned closing of a coal mine in Iwaki (northeastern Japan) will put 2,000 people out of work with devastating effects on the community. The mining company plans to build the Hawaiian Center to promote tourism, but the idea meets with resistance by the community's union families who boycott the effort. However, a few of the young women in Joban see the call for dancers to possibly provide a more promising future. Norio Yoshimoto is put in charge of organizing the center, with Madoka Hirayama, a professional dancer fleeing creditors in Tokyo hired to train the dancers. Kimiko, her friend Sanae, and Sayuri are amongst the handful first showing up for lessons but soon others join them. When Kimiko's mother, Chiyo, discovers that she has skipped school classes to learn dancing the two argue and Kimiko leaves home. Her brother Yojiro, one of the newly out of work miners, comes to be supportive of her dancing as he becomes protective of Madoka. The girls start to tour neighboring communities and dance to promote the center, getting more proficient in the process. After secretly seeing Kimiko practice, and how good she has become, Chiyo helps gather heaters to save palm trees imported from Taiwan from dying from the cold. Her change of heart as head of the union's woman's organization shifts the sympathies of the community as the opening of the center nears. Madoka has molded coal miner's daughters into professional dancers, and Kimiko performs a standout solo dance at the opening.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Hura gâru (2006) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Inspiration 30%, Joy 25%, Empathy 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Inspiration30%
- Joy25%
- Empathy20%
- Humor15%
- Sadness10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Inspiration, Joy, Empathy. Genres: Comedy, Drama. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Inspiration, Joy and Empathy. Its IMDb rating of 7.1/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 69/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Hope
- Sadness
- Joy
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Joy
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Hope | Sadness | Joy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Humor | 45 % | 25 % | 20 % | 10 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 9′ | Humor | 46 % | 23 % | 16 % | 11 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Humor | 48 % | 23 % | 10 % | 13 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Hope | 51 % | 31 % | 15 % | 10 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Tension | 56 % | 40 % | 29 % | 8 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Hope | 53 % | 43 % | 32 % | 13 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Hope | 48 % | 43 % | 25 % | 21 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Hope | 54 % | 35 % | 28 % | 20 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Tension | 69 % | 29 % | 51 % | 13 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Sadness | 75 % | 35 % | 68 % | 11 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 64′ | Sadness | 65 % | 36 % | 54 % | 13 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Tension | 58 % | 40 % | 30 % | 20 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 76′ | Hope | 64 % | 45 % | 29 % | 24 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 82′ | Tension | 78 % | 34 % | 55 % | 11 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Sadness | 83 % | 34 % | 69 % | 6 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 94′ | Hope | 79 % | 57 % | 49 % | 25 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 100′ | Hope | 79 % | 74 % | 23 % | 54 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 106′ | Joy | 78 % | 71 % | 9 % | 68 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 112′ | Hope | 70 % | 65 % | 13 % | 57 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 118′ | Hope | 62 % | 60 % | 25 % | 42 % |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Hura gâru. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Kadri
Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Hura gâru — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.
Premise onlyAfterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Sayuri Kumano
Hatsuko Sasaki
Sanae Kimura
Mitsuo Igari
Goro Kumano
Seiji Kimura
Chiyo Tanikawa
Junko Soma
Hiroko Miyata
Union Leader for Miners
Sumie Muto
Yoneko Tsutaya
Details
- Directed by
- Sang-il Lee
- Written by
- Sang-il Lee, Daisuke Habara
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2006
- Runtime
- 121 min
- Country
- Japan
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Inspiration
- Data updated
Where to watch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





