Battle in Seattle
2007 · 99 min · Director: Stuart Townsend
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
In late November 1999, masses are descending upon Seattle for the World Trade Organization (WTO) Conference, the first ever held on American soil. Beyond the several delegates, career protesters are also coming to Seattle, they who believe the non-elected organization only exists to support corporate interests at the expense of the poor, working class and the environment among other things. Before the conference, the lead known protesters vow that their demonstrations will be peaceful, while Seattle Mayor Jim Tobin promises that if that be the case that no arrests will be made and no aggressive action, such as the use of tear gas, will be issued. On day one of the conference, tensions on both sides escalate the confrontation between police and protesters, with many innocent people caught in the crossfire. As such, what was promised ends up not happening during the remainder of the conference, where many on both sides work not for the greater good of their side, but rather for their own personal interests because of their experience on day one. These battles outside the official conference are not the only ones happening in Seattle, as many of the conference delegates, such as Doctors Without Borders and those from some of the poorer nations, try to get across the point of many of the protesters - albeit in a more diplomatic method - while seemingly ignored by those in the upper echelon of the organization.
Emotional fingerprint
Battle in Seattle (2007) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Anxiety 30%, Empathy 25%, Anger 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Anxiety30%
- Empathy25%
- Anger20%
- Sadness15%
- Inspiration10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Anxiety, Empathy, Anger. Genres: Drama, History, Action. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Anxiety, Empathy and Anger. Its IMDb rating of 6.6/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 68/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Empathy
- Sadness
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Empathy | Sadness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Tension | 38 % | 37 % | 12 % | 7 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Tension | 40 % | 35 % | 14 % | 6 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Hope | 43 % | 34 % | 16 % | 3 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 17′ | Hope | 50 % | 43 % | 19 % | 1 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 22′ | Tension | 55 % | 50 % | 21 % | 6 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Relief | 58 % | 53 % | 25 % | 11 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Tension | 65 % | 63 % | 31 % | 13 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 37′ | Tension | 76 % | 76 % | 46 % | 21 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 42′ | Tension | 80 % | 77 % | 61 % | 39 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 47′ | Sadness | 76 % | 61 % | 65 % | 56 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 52′ | Sadness | 78 % | 53 % | 68 % | 68 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Sadness | 76 % | 60 % | 66 % | 56 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Tension | 70 % | 63 % | 60 % | 38 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 67′ | Empathy | 70 % | 64 % | 56 % | 34 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 72′ | Tension | 75 % | 68 % | 60 % | 41 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 77′ | Empathy | 77 % | 54 % | 71 % | 55 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 82′ | Empathy | 78 % | 31 % | 71 % | 53 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Hope | 79 % | 18 % | 53 % | 29 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 92′ | Relief | 70 % | 9 % | 30 % | 14 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 97′ | Hope | 52 % | 5 % | 17 % | 15 % |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Rioter (uncredited)
Anchor #2
Details
- Directed by
- Stuart Townsend
- Written by
- Stuart Townsend
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2007
- Runtime
- 99 min
- Country
- Germany, Canada, United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Anxiety
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
