From Prada to Nada
2011 · 107 min · Director: Angel Gracia
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
When their dad dies on his 55th birthday, Beverly Hills sisters Mary and Nora find themselves destitute, forced by a grasping sister-in-law to move in with their aunt in East L.A. Mary, the younger sister, is mortified: spoiled by her dad, ignorant of Spanish, scared of the vatos. Her sister convinces her to finish college, and she promptly decides that one of her T.A.s will be her ticket back to Rodeo Drive. Elder sister Nora, a law student, gets a job as a legal intern, and her supervisor Edward, brother of the grasping sister-in-law, promptly falls for her. Slowly the sisters realize what a rich place the barrio is at the same time that they get bruised in the contact sport of love.
Emotional fingerprint
From Prada to Nada (2011) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 30%, Love 25%, Smile 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor30%
- Love25%
- Smile20%
- Empathy15%
- Satisfaction10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Love, Smile. Genres: Comedy, Drama, Action. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Love and Smile. Its IMDb rating of 5.6/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 58/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Love
- Hope
- Humor
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Love | Hope | Humor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Humor | 45 % | 17 % | 5 % | 33 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Sadness | 49 % | 11 % | 6 % | 30 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Humor | 46 % | 8 % | 9 % | 35 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Humor | 39 % | 9 % | 13 % | 38 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 24′ | Humor | 34 % | 10 % | 20 % | 34 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Humor | 36 % | 11 % | 28 % | 36 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Humor | 43 % | 18 % | 29 % | 43 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 40′ | Humor | 44 % | 26 % | 29 % | 39 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Hope | 41 % | 29 % | 32 % | 25 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Hope | 41 % | 28 % | 36 % | 21 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Hope | 45 % | 33 % | 36 % | 29 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Love | 49 % | 41 % | 30 % | 29 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 67′ | Love | 49 % | 41 % | 20 % | 21 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 72′ | Love | 48 % | 34 % | 18 % | 18 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Sadness | 49 % | 29 % | 21 % | 21 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Sadness | 55 % | 33 % | 18 % | 20 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Tension | 61 % | 40 % | 20 % | 16 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 94′ | Hope | 64 % | 48 % | 40 % | 23 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 99′ | Love | 68 % | 58 % | 55 % | 25 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 104′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Cinderella
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Natalia
Carry Sullivan
Marco Antonio Ramirez
Benjamin Kerensky
Professor Smith
Car Buyer
Details
- Directed by
- Angel Gracia
- Written by
- Fina Torres, Craig Fernandez, Luis Alfaro
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2011
- Runtime
- 107 min
- Country
- Mexico, United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Free
Rent
Also on
Availability varies by country
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
