The Wolf of Wall Street
2013 · 180 min · Director: Martin Scorsese, Martin Scorsese
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
In the early 1990s, Jordan Belfort teamed with his partner Donny Azoff and started brokerage firm Stratton Oakmont. Their company quickly grows from a staff of 20 to a staff of more than 250 and their status in the trading community and Wall Street grows exponentially. So much that companies file their initial public offerings through them. As their status grows, so do the amount of substances they abuse, and so do their lies. They draw attention like no other, throwing lavish parties for their staff when they hit the jackpot on high trades. That ultimately leads to Belfort featured on the cover of Forbes Magazine, being called "The Wolf Of Wall St.". With the FBI onto Belfort's trading schemes, he devises new ways to cover his tracks and watch his fortune grow. Belfort ultimately comes up with a scheme to stash their cash in a European bank. But with the FBI watching him like a hawk, how long will Belfort and Azoff be able to maintain their elaborate wealth and luxurious lifestyles?
Emotional fingerprint
The Wolf of Wall Street (2013) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 30%, Excitement 25%, Disturbing 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor30%
- Excitement25%
- Disturbing20%
- Envy15%
- Anger10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Excitement, Disturbing. Genres: Comedy, Crime, Biography. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Excitement and Disturbing. Its IMDb rating of 8.2/10 suggests a strong audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 74/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Humor
- Disturbing
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Excitement
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Humor | Disturbing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 5′ | Humor | 52 % | 17 % | 45 % | 28 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 14′ | Humor | 50 % | 18 % | 46 % | 29 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Humor | 51 % | 18 % | 48 % | 30 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Humor | 55 % | 21 % | 44 % | 35 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 41′ | Excitement | 57 % | 24 % | 40 % | 44 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 50′ | Humor | 56 % | 23 % | 40 % | 40 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 59′ | Sadness | 56 % | 26 % | 39 % | 31 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Humor | 56 % | 32 % | 39 % | 32 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 77′ | Humor | 59 % | 36 % | 38 % | 34 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 86′ | Excitement | 64 % | 41 % | 35 % | 31 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 95′ | Tension | 63 % | 41 % | 41 % | 31 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 104′ | Humor | 61 % | 39 % | 46 % | 35 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 113′ | Tension | 66 % | 51 % | 48 % | 41 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 122′ | Humor | 71 % | 64 % | 46 % | 45 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 131′ | Tension | 69 % | 61 % | 34 % | 43 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 140′ | Tension | 68 % | 60 % | 25 % | 41 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 149′ | Tension | 73 % | 65 % | 23 % | 46 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 158′ | Tension | 76 % | 69 % | 19 % | 56 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 167′ | Tension | 68 % | 59 % | 19 % | 51 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 176′ | Humor | 48 % | 37 % | 22 % | 30 % |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about The Wolf of Wall Street. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Robbie Feinberg ('Pinhead')
Peter DeBlasio
Details
- Directed by
- Martin Scorsese, Martin Scorsese
- Written by
- Terence Winter, Jordan Belfort
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2013
- Runtime
- 180 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Rent
Also on
Availability varies by country
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
