Lezioni di cioccolato
2007 · 99 min · Director: Claudio Cupellini
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Mattia, a 32 year old building contractor in Perugia has lots of style, nice suits, nice car, gorgeous looking girlfriend but behind this facade is cutting corners with site safety and hiring immigrant workers. Taking to the golf course hoping to meet wealthy, upmarket clients he meets a doctor who offers him a contract to build a luxurious weekend getaway but not one Euro above 300,000 will he pay. Meantime back on site to save 12,000 euros in scaffolding he has illegally-hired worker Kamal working on a roof without any safety nets and Kamal falls from the roof, finishing up in hospital with his entire upper body in plaster. Kamal unknown to Mattia has won a position in a chocolate making competition at a nearby factory who are celebrating their centenary of operation. Before leaving Egypt, Kamal was a pastry cook in Egypt. By doing the chocolate course he hopes to gain a diploma to start a new career in Italy as a chocolate maker. First prize is enough money to start his own business. So Mattia has a choic;face the police or stand in for Kamal at the advanced chocolate making course. Egyptian laborer versus trendy Italian businessman. So goodbye pony tail, hello perm, goodbye smart phone and clothes. In the class are: a middle aged woman, a man whose father owns 4 pastry shops and the beautiful, passionate Cecilia, whose love life is littered with liars. Feeling sorry for our stand in Kamal she offers to coach Mattia, after hours, to improve his chocolate making. Mattia leads a double life of Egyptian by day, homework and contractor by day and night transforming in the process from being self centred to finding love and life at the same time.
Emotional fingerprint
Lezioni di cioccolato (2007) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 30%, Empathy 25%, Guilt 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor30%
- Empathy25%
- Guilt20%
- Love15%
- Satisfaction10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Empathy, Guilt. Genres: Comedy. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Empathy and Guilt. Its IMDb rating of 6.1/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 64/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Hope
- Empathy
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Hope | Empathy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Humor | 47 % | 35 % | 2 % | 25 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Tension | 55 % | 38 % | 10 % | 34 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Humor | 57 % | 49 % | 21 % | 30 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 17′ | Humor | 55 % | 54 % | 20 % | 20 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 22′ | Humor | 53 % | 50 % | 14 % | 20 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Humor | 49 % | 46 % | 14 % | 25 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Humor | 51 % | 46 % | 19 % | 34 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 37′ | Humor | 56 % | 50 % | 21 % | 38 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 42′ | Humor | 54 % | 51 % | 19 % | 29 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 47′ | Humor | 51 % | 46 % | 21 % | 34 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 52′ | Empathy | 58 % | 45 % | 33 % | 46 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Hope | 63 % | 51 % | 43 % | 41 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Humor | 61 % | 56 % | 39 % | 33 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 67′ | Humor | 61 % | 54 % | 29 % | 29 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 72′ | Love | 68 % | 46 % | 20 % | 40 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 77′ | Empathy | 71 % | 43 % | 25 % | 51 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 82′ | Hope | 71 % | 44 % | 50 % | 39 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Hope | 76 % | 48 % | 69 % | 30 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 92′ | Hope | 80 % | 52 % | 73 % | 35 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 97′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Rags to riches
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Lezioni di cioccolato. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Corrado
Milo
Shamira
Sindaco
Ragazza castana
Padre milo
Povero nella mensa
Garzone
Jaffar
Details
- Directed by
- Claudio Cupellini
- Written by
- Fabio Bonifacci, Christian Poli
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2007
- Runtime
- 99 min
- Country
- Italy
- Genres
- Comedy
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
