Megan Is Missing
2011 · 86 min · Director: Michael Goi
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Megan Stewart, 14, and her best friend Amy Herman, 13, though opposites in personality, are best friends. Megan carries the front of being the most popular girl in school, but this masks a lifestyle of hard partying, drugs, alcohol and indiscriminate sex. Amy, unpopular and socially awkward, clings to her relationship with Megan as a lifeline to social acceptance. Together, these two young girls forge a deep friendship based on their mutual needs. The two girls regularly communicate by web chat cameras or cell phone, and even meet boys online. As Megan seeks friends who are different from her usual posse of hanger-ons, she is introduced by a friend online to a 17 year-old boy named Josh in a chat room. Megan and Josh bond quickly, leaving Amy feeling a bit left out. One day, Megan goes to meet Josh in person, and she is never seen again. Amy launches into a concentrated effort to find her friend. As the media swirls around the story of Megan's disappearance, Amy discovers the horrifying truth about what happened to her friend. Based on research into seven actual cases of child abduction, MEGAN IS MISSING is an uncompromising, gut-wrenching view of the world children live in today. Harrowing in its realism, the film uses only fact-based incidences to depict the lives of ordinary kids walking in the midst of extraordinary evil.
Emotional fingerprint
Megan Is Missing (2011) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Disturbing 38%, Fear 25%, Anxiety 22%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Disturbing38%
- Fear25%
- Anxiety22%
- Sadness10%
- Empathy5%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Disturbing, Fear, Anxiety. Genres: Thriller, Drama, Horror. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Disturbing, Fear and Anxiety. Its IMDb rating of 4.6/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 56/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Empathy
- Sadness
- Fear
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Empathy | Sadness | Fear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Tension | 37 % | 13 % | 5 % | 7 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 6′ | Disturbing | 43 % | 23 % | 11 % | 11 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Disturbing | 50 % | 36 % | 24 % | 16 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Disturbing | 59 % | 51 % | 39 % | 18 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Disturbing | 73 % | 68 % | 56 % | 18 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 24′ | Disturbing | 67 % | 63 % | 51 % | 14 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Empathy | 42 % | 38 % | 24 % | 8 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Empathy | 31 % | 25 % | 9 % | 6 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 37′ | Tension | 40 % | 29 % | 14 % | 16 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 41′ | Tension | 55 % | 43 % | 34 % | 33 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Sadness | 67 % | 58 % | 50 % | 43 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 49′ | Tension | 72 % | 64 % | 54 % | 50 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 54′ | Sadness | 76 % | 66 % | 59 % | 59 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Tension | 81 % | 71 % | 64 % | 69 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Disturbing | 90 % | 80 % | 69 % | 81 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 67′ | Disturbing | 95 % | 87 % | 77 % | 89 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Disturbing | 96 % | 91 % | 86 % | 91 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 75′ | Sadness | 98 % | 94 % | 92 % | 92 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 80′ | Sadness | 93 % | 89 % | 88 % | 72 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 84′ | Sadness | 83 % | 78 % | 78 % | 36 % |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Lexie
Kathy
Chelsea
Angie
Gideon
Ben
Bill Herman
Callie Daniels
Detective Simonelli
Leif Marcus
Re-enactment Megan
Lead Reporter
News Reporter
Principal Carpenter
2nd Detective
Details
- Directed by
- Michael Goi
- Written by
- Michael Goi
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2011
- Runtime
- 86 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Disturbing
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
