Bikram: Yogi, Guru, Predator
2019 · 86 min · Director: Eva Orner
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Bikram Choudhury was at the forefront of popularizing yoga in North America and around the world. An Indian immigrant with a Beverly Hills base, Choudhury was a born entertainer, known for dressing in nothing more than a black speedo and a Rolex. His teaching style was tough love sprinkled with salty language and punctuated by spontaneous bursts of singing. His followers hailed him for helping them to gain confidence, lose weight, and overcome physical ailments through his specialty of hot yoga. He built a franchise empire with hundreds of Bikram studios around the world. Filmmaker Eva Orner traces Choudhury from his rise in the 1970s to his disgrace in accusations of rape and sexual harassment in more recent years. She taps a vast trove of archival footage that demonstrates Choudhury's charm and offers clues to his dark side. She conducts extensive interviews with his one-time acolytes who now feel betrayed, including yoga devotee Sarah Baughn who brought serious charges against him years before the reckoning of the #MeToo movement, and Choudhury's long-time lawyer Micki Jafa-Bodden. Over the years, Choudhury's story has received steady press coverage, but there is a fresh power in this telling, with key figures going on camera to describe their complicated journey. The film raises larger questions about the nature of leaders and followers and the corruption of messianic figures. To this day, Choudhury has evaded prosecution and continues to attract yoga students from all over the world, bringing added tension to this rigorous investigation.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Bikram: Yogi, Guru, Predator (2019) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Disturbing 35%, Anger 25%, Empathy 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Disturbing35%
- Anger25%
- Empathy20%
- Anxiety10%
- Inspiration10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Disturbing, Anger, Empathy. Genres: Documentary, Crime. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Disturbing, Anger and Empathy. Its IMDb rating of 6.7/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 70/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Disturbing
- Empathy
- Anger
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion: Anger
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Disturbing | Empathy | Anger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Curiosity | 47 % | 22 % | 15 % | 8 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 6′ | Curiosity | 45 % | 19 % | 25 % | 6 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Curiosity | 44 % | 16 % | 31 % | 5 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Curiosity | 40 % | 16 % | 23 % | 8 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Curiosity | 40 % | 23 % | 20 % | 11 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 24′ | Empathy | 48 % | 35 % | 35 % | 16 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Disturbing | 55 % | 48 % | 45 % | 24 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Disturbing | 62 % | 57 % | 49 % | 34 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 37′ | Disturbing | 74 % | 70 % | 63 % | 50 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 41′ | Disturbing | 85 % | 81 % | 79 % | 66 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Disturbing | 83 % | 79 % | 78 % | 70 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 49′ | Anger | 76 % | 71 % | 69 % | 69 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 54′ | Anger | 80 % | 73 % | 71 % | 75 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Anger | 78 % | 63 % | 61 % | 73 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Anger | 66 % | 41 % | 36 % | 58 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 67′ | Curiosity | 64 % | 38 % | 29 % | 55 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Anger | 74 % | 46 % | 48 % | 66 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 75′ | Empathy | 82 % | 58 % | 70 % | 74 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 80′ | Disturbing | 67 % | 56 % | 57 % | 57 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 84′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | 37 % | 34 % | 25 % | 27 % |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Bikram: Yogi, Guru, Predator. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Kadri
Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Bikram: Yogi, Guru, Predator — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.
Premise onlyAfterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Self (archive footage)
Self - Former Yoga Teacher
Self - Yogi
Self - Former Head of Legal Affairs
Self - Attorney
Self - Trail Attorney
Self - Studio Owner
Self - Studio Owner
Self - Former Yoga Teacher
Self - Studio Owner
Self - Medical Assistant
Details
- Directed by
- Eva Orner
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2019
- Runtime
- 86 min
- Country
- United States
- Genres
- Documentary, Crime
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Disturbing
- Data updated
Where to watch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





