Christmas Under the Stars
2019 · 84 min · Director: Allan Harmon
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
A Christmas-tree lot helps two people rediscover their holiday spirit.
Emotional fingerprint
Christmas Under the Stars (2019) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Happiness 30%, Love 25%, Hope 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Happiness30%
- Love25%
- Hope20%
- Nostalgia15%
- Satisfaction10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Happiness, Love, Hope. Genres: Drama, Romance. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Happiness, Love and Hope. Its IMDb rating of 6.8/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 68/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Love
- Hope
- Relief
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion: Sympathy
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Love | Hope | Relief |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Hope | 28 % | 5 % | 13 % | 0 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 6′ | Sympathy | 35 % | 5 % | 14 % | 1 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Hope | 35 % | 8 % | 21 % | 6 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Hope | 35 % | 13 % | 25 % | 9 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Sympathy | 40 % | 16 % | 21 % | 5 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Sympathy | 44 % | 24 % | 25 % | 8 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Love | 44 % | 33 % | 31 % | 14 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Hope | 40 % | 31 % | 30 % | 11 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 36′ | Sympathy | 40 % | 33 % | 30 % | 9 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 40′ | Love | 44 % | 40 % | 34 % | 11 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Love | 46 % | 43 % | 30 % | 10 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Love | 50 % | 38 % | 23 % | 5 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Sadness | 49 % | 30 % | 20 % | 3 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Love | 51 % | 34 % | 19 % | 3 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Sadness | 59 % | 36 % | 19 % | 4 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Sympathy | 56 % | 35 % | 26 % | 10 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 69′ | Love | 54 % | 43 % | 35 % | 18 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Love | 55 % | 46 % | 43 % | 28 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Relief | 63 % | 49 % | 53 % | 49 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 82′ | Relief | 73 % | 55 % | 58 % | 67 % |
Cinderella
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Christmas Under the Stars. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Matt Gibbons
Kate
Mia Knowles
Nick's Assistant
Details
- Directed by
- Allan Harmon
- Written by
- Jamie Pachino, Rikk Dunlap
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2019
- Runtime
- 84 min
- Country
- United States, Canada
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Happiness
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Rent
Data: JustWatch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
