Love, Guaranteed
2020 · 90 min · Director: Mark Steven Johnson
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
To save her small law firm, earnest lawyer Susan takes a high-paying case from Nick, a charming new client who wants to sue a dating website that guarantees love. But as the case heats up, so do Susan and Nick's feelings for each ...
Emotional fingerprint
Love, Guaranteed (2020) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 30%, Love 25%, Joy 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor30%
- Love25%
- Joy20%
- Anticipation15%
- Satisfaction10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Love, Joy. Genres: Comedy, Romance. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Love and Joy. Its IMDb rating of 5.6/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 58/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Love
- Joy
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Joy
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Love | Joy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Humor | 35 % | 33 % | 4 % | 19 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Humor | 39 % | 38 % | 3 % | 18 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Humor | 43 % | 43 % | 4 % | 16 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Humor | 47 % | 47 % | 6 % | 16 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 20′ | Humor | 49 % | 49 % | 8 % | 17 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 25′ | Humor | 50 % | 50 % | 13 % | 19 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Humor | 47 % | 45 % | 21 % | 21 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Love | 42 % | 38 % | 21 % | 18 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Humor | 44 % | 38 % | 15 % | 16 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Humor | 43 % | 37 % | 15 % | 18 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 47′ | Tension | 41 % | 31 % | 19 % | 15 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 52′ | Love | 49 % | 34 % | 30 % | 24 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Joy | 55 % | 39 % | 36 % | 37 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Humor | 53 % | 31 % | 32 % | 27 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Sadness | 48 % | 21 % | 25 % | 12 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Tension | 48 % | 21 % | 18 % | 8 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Sadness | 55 % | 19 % | 28 % | 12 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 79′ | Love | 67 % | 22 % | 54 % | 34 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Love | 64 % | 24 % | 61 % | 47 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Love | 47 % | 13 % | 45 % | 34 % |
Cinderella
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Melanie
Gideon
Parent Girl
Mom
Rita Wu
Reporter
Lifestyle Reporter
Details
- Directed by
- Mark Steven Johnson
- Written by
- Elizabeth Hackett, Hilary Galanoy
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2020
- Runtime
- 90 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
