feeldb

The Man Standing Next

2020 · 114 min · Director: Min-ho Woo, Woo Min-ho ★ IMDb 7 · 5,216 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

THE UNTOLD STORY OF THE KOREAN PRESIDENT AND THE RIGHT-HAND MAN WHO PULLED THE TRIGGER It is 1979, and South Korea has been under the absolute domination of President Park's dictatorship for 18 long years. Kim Gyu-pyeong, the director of the Korean Central Intelligence Agency, has asserted his loyalty to the president despite having his doubts about the leader's intentions. When the former director of the KCIA flees to America with a time-bomb of government secrets, Kim is sent on a mission to stop the truth in its tracks. But as the government's web of lies continues to be spun, tensions build, alliances crumble, and the once impenetrable leadership must face the fact that all men, no matter how powerful, must die.

Ask Kadri

Trailer for The Man Standing Next

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

The Man Standing Next (2020) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Tension 35%, Anxiety 25%, Anger 15%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

15%Anger
  1. Anger15%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Tension, Anxiety, Anger. Genres: Thriller. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Tension, Anxiety and Anger. Its IMDb rating of 7.0/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 70/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Tension
  • Disturbing
  • Curiosity

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Tension

Dominant emotion: Curiosity

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Tension
Disturbing
Curiosity
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values. Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 18 %, then peaks around 53 %, then peaks around 83 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityTensionDisturbingCuriosity
2.5 %≈ 3′Tension62 %62 %25 %53 %
7.5 %≈ 9′Tension57 %56 %25 %54 %
12.5 %≈ 14′Curiosity53 %49 %24 %53 %
17.5 %≈ 20′Curiosity48 %43 %24 %43 %
22.5 %≈ 26′Tension49 %45 %29 %35 %
27.5 %≈ 31′Tension56 %55 %35 %39 %
32.5 %≈ 37′Tension59 %59 %36 %48 %
37.5 %≈ 43′Curiosity58 %58 %33 %55 %
42.5 %≈ 48′Tension63 %63 %34 %55 %
47.5 %≈ 54′Tension70 %70 %36 %53 %
52.5 %≈ 60′Tension72 %72 %32 %53 %
57.5 %≈ 66′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
62.5 %≈ 71′Tension70 %67 %57 %35 %
67.5 %≈ 77′Tension69 %66 %53 %35 %
72.5 %≈ 83′Tension74 %71 %58 %34 %
77.5 %≈ 88′Tension80 %79 %59 %34 %
82.5 %≈ 94′Tension88 %88 %61 %34 %
87.5 %≈ 100′Tension88 %80 %68 %30 %
92.5 %≈ 105′Sadness78 %58 %62 %28 %
97.5 %≈ 111′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
Riches to rags

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about The Man Standing Next. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about The Man Standing Next — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

Lee Byung-hun

Kim Gyu-pyeong

Lee Hee-jun

Kwak Sang-cheon

Kim So-jin

Deborah Shim

Seo Hyun-woo

Jeon Du-hyeok

JH
Ji Hyun-jun

KCIA Agent Ham Dae-yong

PS
Park Seong-geun

KCIA Secretary Kang Chang-su

PJ
Park Ji-il

Kim Gye-hoon

LT
Lee Tae-hyung

Yoo Dong-hun

JS
Ju Seok-tae

Shin Ik-chi

LD
Lee Do-guk

Chief of Protocol

KM
Kim Min-sang

Jang Seung-ho

Kim Hong-pa

Ambassador Yun

LS
Lee San-ho

KCIA Agent Yoo Dong-hoon

KS
Kim Seung-hoon

Professor Lim

LY
Lee Yang-hee

Congressman Kim

JH
Jo Hye-joo

College Student

JD
John D. Michaels

Congressman Harrington

LS
Lee Seung-jin

Driver

Details

Directed by
Min-ho Woo, Woo Min-ho
Written by
Min-ho Woo, Lee Ji-min, Woo Min-ho
Type
Movies
Released
2020
Runtime
114 min
Country
South Korea
Genres
Thriller
Ratings
★ IMDb 7 · 5,216 ratings
Feels mostly
Tension
Data updated

Where to watch

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.