W.
2008 · 129 min · Director: Oliver Stone
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Oliver Stone's biographical take on the life of George W. Bush, chronicling from his wild and carefree days in college, to his military service, to his governorship of Texas and role in the oil business, his 2000 candidacy for president, his first turbulent four years, and his 2004 re-election campaign.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
W. (2008) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 25%, Curiosity 25%, Surprise 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor25%
- Curiosity25%
- Surprise20%
- Anxiety15%
- Melancholy15%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Curiosity, Surprise. Genres: Comedy, Drama, Biography. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Curiosity and Surprise. Its IMDb rating of 6.3/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 64/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Disturbing
- Curiosity
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Disturbing | Curiosity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Tension | 47 % | 40 % | 28 % | 31 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 10′ | Humor | 42 % | 31 % | 21 % | 24 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Tension | 46 % | 36 % | 27 % | 24 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Disturbing | 53 % | 46 % | 39 % | 29 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Tension | 44 % | 37 % | 26 % | 28 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Humor | 36 % | 27 % | 12 % | 26 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 42′ | Sadness | 38 % | 25 % | 11 % | 26 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Sadness | 42 % | 25 % | 17 % | 27 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 55′ | Disturbing | 51 % | 40 % | 35 % | 34 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Tension | 61 % | 54 % | 49 % | 41 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Disturbing | 56 % | 45 % | 45 % | 39 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Sadness | 44 % | 29 % | 27 % | 31 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Humor | 43 % | 32 % | 22 % | 26 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Tension | 54 % | 48 % | 37 % | 27 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 94′ | Tension | 59 % | 54 % | 46 % | 30 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 100′ | Disturbing | 54 % | 48 % | 42 % | 31 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 106′ | Tension | 53 % | 44 % | 36 % | 33 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 113′ | Sadness | 50 % | 38 % | 29 % | 28 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 119′ | Humor | 43 % | 32 % | 19 % | 23 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 126′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Fraternity Pledge #1
Fraternity Pledge #2
Oil Worker
Oil Rig Driller
1971 Houston Oilman #1
1971 Houston Oilman #2
Details
- Directed by
- Oliver Stone
- Written by
- Stanley Weiser
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2008
- Runtime
- 129 min
- Country
- United States, Australia, Hong Kong, Switzerland, China
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Free
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.




