When in Rome
2010 · 91 min · Director: Mark Steven Johnson
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Beth is a hard working career woman whose last relationship says that she puts her work above him so he left her. When he tells her he found another career woman and is willing to stick it out with her and is engaged to her, Beth feels that there is no one for her. And when she goes to Rome to attend her sister's impromptu wedding and after meeting the best man, Nick, she's attracted to him but after seeing him with another woman, she gets drunk and goes into the famed Fountain of Love and takes some coins thrown by people looking for love. When she goes back to New York four men start coming onto her. And Nick keeps calling her asking her out. She later learns that what she did--is a no no. It seems legend says that if you take a coin out of the fountain the person who threw it will fall in love with who took the coin. So she has to find a way to break the curse. And she wonders if Nick, whom she likes, is with her cause he wants to or if he is under the spell.
Emotional fingerprint
When in Rome (2010) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 30%, Love 25%, Happiness 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Love, Happiness. Genres: Comedy, Romance. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Love and Happiness. Its IMDb rating of 5.5/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 57/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Love
- Hope
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Love | Hope |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Humor | 39 % | 31 % | 12 % | 9 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Humor | 41 % | 33 % | 21 % | 15 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Love | 49 % | 43 % | 27 % | 17 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Humor | 56 % | 53 % | 24 % | 16 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 20′ | Humor | 53 % | 48 % | 22 % | 18 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 25′ | Sadness | 50 % | 43 % | 20 % | 15 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 30′ | Humor | 55 % | 51 % | 17 % | 11 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Humor | 56 % | 55 % | 14 % | 7 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Humor | 55 % | 52 % | 11 % | 9 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Humor | 56 % | 52 % | 12 % | 15 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Humor | 56 % | 53 % | 14 % | 16 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 52′ | Humor | 58 % | 45 % | 20 % | 14 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Sadness | 60 % | 27 % | 33 % | 22 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Love | 61 % | 25 % | 43 % | 36 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 66′ | Humor | 60 % | 37 % | 41 % | 43 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Hope | 59 % | 40 % | 40 % | 44 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 75′ | Love | 60 % | 38 % | 49 % | 46 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 80′ | Hope | 62 % | 37 % | 54 % | 50 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 84′ | Love | 68 % | 38 % | 59 % | 55 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 89′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about When in Rome. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Umberto
Secretary
Poker Player #1
Details
- Directed by
- Mark Steven Johnson
- Written by
- David Diamond, David Weissman
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2010
- Runtime
- 91 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
