Hatching Pete
2009 · 90 min · Director: Stuart Gillard
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
When Cleatus can't play the school mascot, Pete has to secretly do the job.
Emotional fingerprint
Hatching Pete (2009) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Smile 35%, Humor 25%, Empathy 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Smile35%
- Humor25%
- Empathy20%
- Satisfaction10%
- Hope10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Smile, Humor, Empathy. Genres: Comedy, Family. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Smile, Humor and Empathy. Its IMDb rating of 5.3/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 59/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Joy
- Humor
- Hope
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion: Joy
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Joy | Humor | Hope |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Humor | 47 % | 12 % | 47 % | 12 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Humor | 49 % | 14 % | 49 % | 19 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Humor | 53 % | 18 % | 53 % | 23 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Humor | 55 % | 19 % | 54 % | 20 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 20′ | Humor | 51 % | 18 % | 48 % | 20 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 25′ | Humor | 48 % | 21 % | 44 % | 26 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Humor | 50 % | 25 % | 48 % | 25 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Humor | 50 % | 24 % | 48 % | 19 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Humor | 49 % | 26 % | 48 % | 23 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Humor | 53 % | 34 % | 51 % | 30 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 47′ | Humor | 51 % | 30 % | 46 % | 30 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 52′ | Empathy | 50 % | 24 % | 43 % | 25 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Humor | 53 % | 30 % | 46 % | 25 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Humor | 50 % | 30 % | 45 % | 29 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Humor | 48 % | 21 % | 44 % | 30 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Humor | 48 % | 15 % | 40 % | 31 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Empathy | 51 % | 21 % | 34 % | 38 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 79′ | Hope | 60 % | 44 % | 35 % | 50 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Joy | 71 % | 66 % | 34 % | 55 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Joy | 80 % | 78 % | 28 % | 50 % |
Cinderella
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Hatching Pete. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Cammie Poole
Doris Ivey
Dil Jensen
Jack Poole
Drum Major Skylar
Brewster High Student
Bob
Susan
Chicken body double
Details
- Directed by
- Stuart Gillard
- Written by
- Paul W. Cooper
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2009
- Runtime
- 90 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Smile
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Also on
Availability varies by country
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
