Suck
2009 · 91 min · Director: Rob Stefaniuk, Rob Stefaniuk
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
In Montreal, Joey is the lead singer of the struggling band "The Winners", composed by the sexy bass singer Jennifer, the guitarist Tyler, the drummer Sam and the handyman Hugo. Their incompetent and alcoholic manager Jeff is incapable to help them to reach success and they are on the road on tour playing in clubs and bars in Canada and United States of America. After a show in a bar in Montreal, Jennifer, who is also the Joey's former girlfriend, leaves the place with the creepy Queeny, who is a vampire, and they spend the night together. On the next morning, Jennifer does not meet the band and they travel in their hearse to participate in a rock 'n' roll show without her. In the last moment, Jennifer arrives with a different appearance and on the next day they find that their home page had had several hits, all of them with good reviews and compliments to Jennifer. They become famous and Jennifer great audiences to the shows of "The Winners" and one by one, the musicians are turned into vampires but the reluctant Joey. "The Winners" become successful and Joey has a dream where he meets the bartender (Alice Cooper) of their show in Montreal in a crossroad and the man tells that he needs to decide whether he wants to be a winner or a loser. Meanwhile the vampire hunter Eddie Van Helsing is hunting the vampire queen and tracking "The Winners" in their shows.
Emotional fingerprint
Suck (2009) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 30%, Excitement 25%, Disturbing 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor30%
- Excitement25%
- Disturbing20%
- Anger15%
- Relief10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Excitement, Disturbing. Genres: Comedy, Horror, Music. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Excitement and Disturbing. Its IMDb rating of 6.0/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 62/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Tension
- Disturbing
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Melancholy
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Tension | Disturbing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Humor | 38 % | 34 % | 19 % | 15 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Humor | 39 % | 31 % | 21 % | 15 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Melancholy | 40 % | 24 % | 27 % | 18 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Tension | 48 % | 30 % | 35 % | 24 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 20′ | Humor | 50 % | 42 % | 33 % | 23 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 25′ | Humor | 54 % | 46 % | 40 % | 34 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 30′ | Tension | 61 % | 48 % | 51 % | 49 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Humor | 62 % | 52 % | 47 % | 52 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Humor | 62 % | 55 % | 41 % | 54 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Humor | 54 % | 49 % | 32 % | 40 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Humor | 45 % | 42 % | 21 % | 19 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 52′ | Humor | 48 % | 46 % | 23 % | 19 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Humor | 56 % | 54 % | 32 % | 25 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Humor | 61 % | 56 % | 39 % | 27 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 66′ | Humor | 62 % | 46 % | 41 % | 38 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Disturbing | 63 % | 41 % | 46 % | 49 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 75′ | Tension | 67 % | 46 % | 57 % | 51 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 80′ | Tension | 69 % | 51 % | 59 % | 48 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 84′ | Humor | 56 % | 39 % | 38 % | 33 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 89′ | Melancholy | 41 % | 17 % | 19 % | 21 % |
Oedipus
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Suck. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Joey
Border Guard
Queenie
Tyler
Sam
Hugo
Danielle
Club Bouncer
Waitress
Details
- Directed by
- Rob Stefaniuk, Rob Stefaniuk
- Written by
- Rob Stefaniuk, Rob Stefaniuk
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2009
- Runtime
- 91 min
- Country
- Canada
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Also on
Availability varies by country
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
