Red Cliff II
2009 · 141 min · Director: John Woo
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
In this sequel to Red Cliff, Chancellor Cao Cao convinces Emperor Xian of the Han to initiate a battle against the two Kingdoms of Shu and Wu, who have become allied forces, against all expectations. Red Cliff will be the site for the gigantic battle.
Emotional fingerprint
Red Cliff II (2009) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Excitement 40%, Tension 25%, Awe 15%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Excitement40%
- Tension25%
- Awe15%
- Anxiety10%
- Satisfaction10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Excitement, Tension, Awe. Genres: Drama, Adventure, Action. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Excitement, Tension and Awe. Its IMDb rating of 7.5/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 74/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Sadness
- Hope
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Sadness | Hope |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 4′ | Tension | 48 % | 43 % | 23 % | 22 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Tension | 55 % | 50 % | 38 % | 16 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Sadness | 58 % | 53 % | 45 % | 14 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 25′ | Tension | 51 % | 44 % | 30 % | 20 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Humor | 51 % | 43 % | 11 % | 25 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Tension | 57 % | 52 % | 6 % | 26 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 46′ | Relief | 60 % | 56 % | 11 % | 30 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Tension | 64 % | 50 % | 30 % | 29 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 60′ | Sadness | 65 % | 43 % | 41 % | 29 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 67′ | Hope | 60 % | 44 % | 29 % | 40 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Hope | 57 % | 45 % | 24 % | 46 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Hope | 59 % | 48 % | 24 % | 40 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Tension | 66 % | 63 % | 19 % | 35 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 95′ | Tension | 74 % | 74 % | 15 % | 33 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 102′ | Tension | 78 % | 78 % | 18 % | 28 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 109′ | Tension | 83 % | 83 % | 30 % | 24 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 116′ | Tension | 84 % | 83 % | 44 % | 20 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 123′ | Tension | 83 % | 80 % | 54 % | 19 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 130′ | Tension | 78 % | 66 % | 51 % | 26 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 137′ | Relief | 68 % | 42 % | 42 % | 37 % |
Icarus
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Xiao Qiao
Lu Su
Guan Yu
Zhang Fei
Huang Gai
Cao Hong
Hua Tuo
Jiang Gan
Zhang Liao
Yue Jin
Details
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
