Columbus Circle
2012 · 82 min · Director: George Gallo
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Abigail Clayton lives alone. Very alone. In fact, the attractive heiress has not left her Manhattan penthouse apartment for almost two decades. The famous daughter of a wealthy industrialist, Abigail disappeared from the prying eyes of the press and the intrusiveness of her family on her 18th birthday, the day she received her massive inheritance. During years of self-imposed isolation, Abigail has had contact with only two people-her building's Concierge, Klandermann, with whom she communicates via notes-and Dr. Raymond Fontaine, a longtime family friend and her sole confidant for most of her life. When the death of her elderly neighbor prompts NYPD Homicide Detective Frank Giardello to launch an investigation, the agoraphobic Abigail is distressed to find him outside her door, asking to question her. Having tried to acquire the dead woman's now vacant apartment to ensure her privacy, Abigail is further upset when her requests go unanswered, and new tenants Lillian and Charlie move in. Abigail anxiously monitors her new neighbors from the safety of her front door's peephole, but her well-ordered world begins to unravel when she finally encounters Lillian and Charlie face-to-face-and her sheltered existence becomes threatened in unexpected and terrifying ways.
Emotional fingerprint
Columbus Circle (2012) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Anxiety 32%, Tension 27%, Curiosity 22%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Anxiety, Tension, Curiosity. Genres: Drama, Mystery, Crime. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Anxiety, Tension and Curiosity. Its IMDb rating of 5.9/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 62/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Curiosity
- Sympathy
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Sympathy
Dominant emotion: Surprise
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Curiosity | Sympathy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 6′ | Curiosity | 45 % | 32 % | 53 % | 13 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 10′ | Curiosity | 45 % | 30 % | 54 % | 14 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 14′ | Curiosity | 45 % | 29 % | 49 % | 16 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Sympathy | 55 % | 45 % | 30 % | 38 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Sympathy | 73 % | 68 % | 19 % | 63 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Sympathy | 74 % | 64 % | 25 % | 68 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 31′ | Sympathy | 60 % | 44 % | 30 % | 60 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Sympathy | 50 % | 35 % | 34 % | 50 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Sympathy | 53 % | 34 % | 40 % | 51 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Sympathy | 61 % | 38 % | 46 % | 56 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 47′ | Curiosity | 68 % | 53 % | 56 % | 48 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Surprise | 74 % | 68 % | 63 % | 36 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 55′ | Tension | 75 % | 71 % | 60 % | 30 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 59′ | Tension | 75 % | 74 % | 54 % | 36 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 64′ | Tension | 79 % | 79 % | 54 % | 49 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Curiosity | 77 % | 77 % | 59 % | 54 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 72′ | Tension | 74 % | 73 % | 59 % | 48 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 76′ | Curiosity | 73 % | 66 % | 57 % | 29 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 80′ | Surprise | 75 % | 63 % | 55 % | 18 % |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Columbus Circle. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Bank Teller
Details
- Directed by
- George Gallo
- Written by
- George Gallo, Kevin Pollak
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2012
- Runtime
- 82 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Anxiety
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
