Code 8: Part II
2024 · 101 min · Director: Jeff Chan
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Follows a girl fighting to get justice for her brother who was slain by corrupt police officers. She enlists the help of an ex-con and his former partner to face off against a highly regarded and well-protected police sergeant.
Emotional fingerprint
Code 8: Part II (2024) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Excitement 30%, Tension 25%, Anger 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Excitement30%
- Tension25%
- Anger20%
- Empathy15%
- Satisfaction10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Excitement, Tension, Anger. Genres: Drama, Crime, Action. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Excitement, Tension and Anger. Its IMDb rating of 5.8/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 59/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Empathy
- Fear
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Empathy | Fear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Tension | 42 % | 37 % | 13 % | 20 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Empathy | 43 % | 35 % | 15 % | 19 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Tension | 58 % | 53 % | 25 % | 36 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Tension | 70 % | 64 % | 41 % | 53 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Sadness | 64 % | 55 % | 42 % | 43 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Tension | 64 % | 59 % | 41 % | 40 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Tension | 69 % | 65 % | 45 % | 45 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Tension | 64 % | 59 % | 43 % | 36 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Tension | 66 % | 61 % | 46 % | 36 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Tension | 79 % | 74 % | 58 % | 53 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Tension | 80 % | 71 % | 61 % | 54 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Empathy | 68 % | 56 % | 55 % | 34 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Tension | 63 % | 57 % | 46 % | 29 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Tension | 69 % | 69 % | 43 % | 38 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Tension | 76 % | 76 % | 44 % | 48 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Tension | 85 % | 84 % | 54 % | 65 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Tension | 88 % | 80 % | 64 % | 66 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Relief | 71 % | 57 % | 51 % | 40 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 93′ | Relief | 52 % | 38 % | 32 % | 18 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 98′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Pavani
Shane
Maev
Tarak
Officer Stillman
Stephanie Kingston
Tamera
Camille
Marcus
Pavani (Younger)
Woman With Walker
News Anchor
Details
Where to watch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
