Chasing Ice
2012 · 74 min · Director: Jeff Orlowski-Yang, Jeff Orlowski
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
'National Geographic' photographer James Balog was once a skeptic about climate change. But through his Extreme Ice Survey, he discovers undeniable evidence of our changing planet. In 'Chasing Ice,' we follow Balog across the Arctic as he deploys revolutionary time-lapse cameras designed for one purpose: to capture a multi-year record of the world's changing glaciers. Balog's hauntingly beautiful videos compress years into seconds and capture ancient mountains of ice in motion as they disappear at a breathtaking rate. Traveling with a young team of adventurers by helicopter, canoe and dog sled across three continents, Balog risks his career and his well-being in pursuit of the biggest story in human history. As the debate polarizes America and the intensity of natural disasters ramp up around the world, 'Chasing Ice' depicts a heroic photojournalist on a mission to gather evidence and deliver hope to our carbon-powered planet
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Chasing Ice (2012) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Awe 35%, Sadness 25%, Inspiration 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Awe35%
- Sadness25%
- Inspiration20%
- Anxiety10%
- Hope10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Awe, Sadness, Inspiration. Genres: Documentary, Biography. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Awe, Sadness and Inspiration. Its IMDb rating of 7.7/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 74/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Awe
- Anxiety
- Inspiration
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Anxiety
Dominant emotion: Awe
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Inspiration
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Awe | Anxiety | Inspiration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Anxiety | 55 % | 32 % | 33 % | 22 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 6′ | Awe | 59 % | 44 % | 25 % | 36 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 9′ | Curiosity | 56 % | 35 % | 29 % | 44 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Curiosity | 57 % | 32 % | 37 % | 35 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 17′ | Awe | 64 % | 45 % | 40 % | 30 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 20′ | Inspiration | 64 % | 33 % | 46 % | 30 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 24′ | Anxiety | 66 % | 13 % | 61 % | 23 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Anxiety | 70 % | 5 % | 66 % | 20 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 31′ | Sadness | 71 % | 8 % | 53 % | 29 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Inspiration | 71 % | 24 % | 43 % | 33 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Anxiety | 68 % | 44 % | 50 % | 20 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Awe | 68 % | 45 % | 61 % | 11 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 46′ | Anxiety | 73 % | 31 % | 61 % | 13 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 50′ | Sadness | 70 % | 29 % | 50 % | 23 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 54′ | Inspiration | 60 % | 34 % | 35 % | 40 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Curiosity | 59 % | 44 % | 30 % | 41 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Awe | 69 % | 61 % | 40 % | 26 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Awe | 80 % | 75 % | 51 % | 26 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Awe | 81 % | 63 % | 51 % | 49 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 72′ | Inspiration | 73 % | 32 % | 42 % | 63 % |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Chasing Ice. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Kadri
Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Chasing Ice — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.
Premise onlyAfterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Self - EIS Engineer
Self - The Aspen Institute
Self - National Geographic Explorer
Self - National Geographic Editor
Self - Climatologist, Ohio State University
Self - Glaciologist, University of Colorado
Self - James's Wife
Self - EIS Videographer
Details
- Directed by
- Jeff Orlowski-Yang, Jeff Orlowski
- Written by
- Mark Monroe
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2012
- Runtime
- 74 min
- Country
- United States
- Genres
- Documentary, Biography
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Awe
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





