The Big Short
2015 · 131 min · Director: Adam McKay
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Three separate but parallel stories of the U.S mortgage housing crisis of 2005 are told. Michael Burry, an eccentric ex-physician turned one-eyed Scion Capital hedge fund manager, has traded traditional office attire for shorts, bare feet and a Supercuts haircut. He believes that the US housing market is built on a bubble that will burst within the next few years. Autonomy within the company allows Burry to do largely as he pleases, so Burry proceeds to bet against the housing market with the banks, who are more than happy to accept his proposal for something that has never happened in American history. The banks believe that Burry is a crackpot and therefore are confident in that they will win the deal. Jared Vennett with Deutschebank gets wind of what Burry is doing and, as an investor believes he too can cash in on Burry's beliefs. An errant telephone call to FrontPoint Partners gets this information into the hands of Mark Baum, an idealist who is fed up with the corruption in the financial industry. Baum and his associates, who work at an arms length under Morgan Stanley, decide to join forces with Vennett despite not totally trusting him. In addition to Burry's information, they further believe that most of the mortgages are overrated by the bond agencies, with the banks collating all the sub-prime mortgages under AAA packages. Charlie Geller and Jamie Shipley, who are minor players in a $30 million start-up garage company called Brownfield, get a hold of Vennett's prospectus on the matter. Wanting in on the action but not having the official clout to play, they decide to call an old "friend", retired investment banker Ben Rickert, to help out. All three of these groups work on the premise that the banks are stupid and don't know what's going on, while for them to win, the general economy has to lose, which means the suffering of the general investor who trusts the financial institutions. That latter aspect may not sit well with Baum. Some of these assumptions may be incorrect and may be far more manipulative than they could have ever imagined, which in turn may throw curves into the process.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
The Big Short (2015) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Curiosity 30%, Anxiety 25%, Humor 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Curiosity30%
- Anxiety25%
- Humor20%
- Satisfaction15%
- Inspiration10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Curiosity, Anxiety, Humor. Genres: Comedy, Drama, Biography. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Curiosity, Anxiety and Humor. Its IMDb rating of 7.8/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 74/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Curiosity
- Tension
- Anger
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Anger
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Curiosity | Tension | Anger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Curiosity | 45 % | 50 % | 28 % | 10 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 10′ | Curiosity | 48 % | 53 % | 34 % | 11 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Curiosity | 51 % | 56 % | 39 % | 11 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Curiosity | 54 % | 59 % | 40 % | 11 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Curiosity | 57 % | 63 % | 44 % | 19 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 36′ | Curiosity | 55 % | 60 % | 45 % | 23 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Curiosity | 50 % | 53 % | 43 % | 21 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 49′ | Curiosity | 54 % | 53 % | 46 % | 29 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Curiosity | 56 % | 56 % | 49 % | 31 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Curiosity | 58 % | 56 % | 51 % | 33 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 69′ | Anger | 60 % | 54 % | 55 % | 41 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 75′ | Curiosity | 60 % | 53 % | 55 % | 43 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 82′ | Tension | 65 % | 50 % | 57 % | 41 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Sadness | 71 % | 45 % | 63 % | 43 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 95′ | Tension | 73 % | 43 % | 69 % | 48 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 102′ | Tension | 71 % | 43 % | 71 % | 53 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 108′ | Tension | 70 % | 39 % | 68 % | 54 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 115′ | Anger | 71 % | 31 % | 61 % | 59 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 121′ | Anger | 72 % | 27 % | 55 % | 62 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 128′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about The Big Short. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Kadri
Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about The Big Short — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.
Premise onlyAfterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Lewis Ranieri
Fund Manager
Details
- Directed by
- Adam McKay
- Written by
- Charles Randolph, Adam McKay, Michael Lewis
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2015
- Runtime
- 131 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Curiosity
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Also on
Availability varies by country
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





