Kon-Tiki
2012 · 118 min · Director: Joachim Rønning, Espen Sandberg
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
The Norwegian explorer Thor Heyerdahl crossed the Pacific Ocean in a balsawood raft in 1947, together with five men, to prove that South Americans back in pre-Columbian times could have crossed the ocean and settled on Polynesian islands. After financing the trips with loans and donations, they set off on an epic 101-day-long trip across 8000 kilometers, while the world was waiting for the result of the trip. The film tells about the origin of the idea, the preparations, and the events on the trip. The "Kon-Tiki" was named after the Inca sun god, Viracocha, and "Kon-Tiki" is an old name for this god. Heyerdahl filmed the expedition, which later became the Academy Award winning documentary in 1951, and he wrote a book about the expedition that was translated into 70 languages and sold more than 50 millions copies around the world. Heyerdahl believed that people from South America could have settled Polynesia in pre-Columbian times, although most anthropologists now believe they did not. Anyway he proved that it was possible by using only the materials and technologies available to those people at that time. The trip took 101 days over 4,300 miles across the Pacific Ocean before the "Kon-Tiki" crashed onto the dangerous reefs outside Raroia in the Tuamotu Islands on August 7, 1947. All crewmen survived, and the "Kon-Tiki" was taken back to Norway. She is now featured in the Kon-Tiki Museum.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Kon-Tiki (2012) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Awe 30%, Excitement 25%, Anticipation 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Awe30%
- Excitement25%
- Anticipation20%
- Inspiration15%
- Tension10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Awe, Excitement, Anticipation. Genres: Drama, Adventure, Biography. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Awe, Excitement and Anticipation. Its IMDb rating of 7.1/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 71/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Sadness
- Hope
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Sadness | Hope |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Relief | 43 % | 33 % | 3 % | 15 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 9′ | Curiosity | 43 % | 26 % | 6 % | 21 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Curiosity | 43 % | 29 % | 11 % | 26 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Hope | 40 % | 28 % | 14 % | 30 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Hope | 38 % | 24 % | 6 % | 35 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Hope | 44 % | 31 % | 14 % | 34 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Sadness | 51 % | 41 % | 29 % | 25 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Tension | 54 % | 50 % | 19 % | 16 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 50′ | Tension | 59 % | 59 % | 8 % | 11 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Tension | 63 % | 61 % | 9 % | 11 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Tension | 61 % | 59 % | 16 % | 11 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Tension | 57 % | 56 % | 23 % | 13 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Tension | 61 % | 61 % | 19 % | 16 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 80′ | Tension | 68 % | 59 % | 21 % | 21 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 86′ | Relief | 65 % | 31 % | 24 % | 38 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 91′ | Relief | 68 % | 26 % | 13 % | 48 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 97′ | Tension | 73 % | 52 % | 7 % | 38 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 103′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 109′ | Sadness | 75 % | 5 % | 70 % | 15 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 115′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Kon-Tiki. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Kadri
Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Kon-Tiki — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.
Premise onlyAfterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Erik Hesselberg
Løytnant Lewis
Journalist
Thor Jr.
Allison
Committee Member
Details
- Directed by
- Joachim Rønning, Espen Sandberg
- Written by
- Petter Skavlan
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2012
- Runtime
- 118 min
- Country
- United Kingdom, Norway, Denmark, Germany, Sweden
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Awe
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Free
Rent
Also on
Availability varies by country
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





