Jupiter Ascending
2015 · 127 min · Director: Lilly Wachowski, Lana Wachowski
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Jupiter Jones was born under a night sky, with signs predicting that she was destined for great things. Now grown, Jupiter dreams of the stars but wakes up to the cold reality of a job cleaning other people's houses and an endless run of bad breaks. Only when Caine Wise, a genetically engineered ex-military hunter, arrives on Earth to track her down does Jupiter begin to glimpse the fate that has been waiting for her all along - her genetic signature marks her as next in line for an extraordinary inheritance that could alter the balance of the cosmos.
Emotional fingerprint
Jupiter Ascending (2015) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Awe 30%, Excitement 25%, Confusion 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Awe30%
- Excitement25%
- Confusion20%
- Curiosity15%
- Love10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Awe, Excitement, Confusion. Genres: Adventure, Action, Sci-Fi. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Awe, Excitement and Confusion. Its IMDb rating of 5.3/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 56/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Curiosity
- Fear
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion: Joy
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Curiosity | Fear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Curiosity | 43 % | 30 % | 42 % | 17 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 10′ | Curiosity | 40 % | 29 % | 41 % | 14 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Curiosity | 43 % | 34 % | 43 % | 20 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 22′ | Curiosity | 55 % | 50 % | 43 % | 38 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Tension | 61 % | 58 % | 41 % | 44 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Curiosity | 56 % | 48 % | 49 % | 31 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 41′ | Curiosity | 54 % | 39 % | 56 % | 21 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Curiosity | 56 % | 35 % | 61 % | 19 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 54′ | Curiosity | 54 % | 31 % | 59 % | 19 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 60′ | Curiosity | 46 % | 27 % | 43 % | 18 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 67′ | Relief | 48 % | 29 % | 36 % | 16 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Curiosity | 60 % | 46 % | 41 % | 30 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 79′ | Tension | 68 % | 64 % | 36 % | 44 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 86′ | Tension | 68 % | 68 % | 29 % | 44 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 92′ | Tension | 70 % | 69 % | 28 % | 45 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 98′ | Tension | 76 % | 74 % | 26 % | 51 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 105′ | Tension | 81 % | 79 % | 21 % | 57 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 111′ | Relief | 80 % | 60 % | 16 % | 44 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 117′ | Joy | 77 % | 28 % | 15 % | 18 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 124′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Cinderella
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Jupiter Ascending. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Vladie
Nesh
Details
- Directed by
- Lilly Wachowski, Lana Wachowski
- Written by
- Lilly Wachowski, Lana Wachowski
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2015
- Runtime
- 127 min
- Country
- United States, Australia
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Awe
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
