Inside Job
2010 · 109 min · Director: Charles Ferguson
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
'Inside Job' provides a comprehensive analysis of the global financial crisis of 2008, which at a cost over $20 trillion, caused millions of people to lose their jobs and homes in the worst recession since the Great Depression, and nearly resulted in a global financial collapse. Through exhaustive research and extensive interviews with key financial insiders, politicians, journalists, and academics, the film traces the rise of a rogue industry which has corrupted politics, regulation, and academia. It was made on location in the United States, Iceland, England, France, Singapore, and China.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Inside Job (2010) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 35%, Curiosity 25%, Surprise 15%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor35%
- Curiosity25%
- Surprise15%
- Excitement15%
- Satisfaction10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Curiosity, Surprise. Genres: Documentary, Crime. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Curiosity and Surprise. Its IMDb rating of 8.2/10 suggests a strong audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 74/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Anger
- Tension
- Anxiety
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Anxiety
Dominant emotion: Anger
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Anger | Tension | Anxiety |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Curiosity | 43 % | 30 % | 32 % | 23 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Curiosity | 45 % | 27 % | 38 % | 29 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 14′ | Anxiety | 49 % | 29 % | 41 % | 36 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Anger | 48 % | 38 % | 38 % | 30 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 25′ | Anger | 44 % | 39 % | 34 % | 23 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 30′ | Curiosity | 45 % | 35 % | 35 % | 29 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Tension | 50 % | 39 % | 41 % | 38 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 41′ | Anger | 54 % | 46 % | 40 % | 34 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 46′ | Anger | 59 % | 55 % | 38 % | 26 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 52′ | Anger | 60 % | 58 % | 44 % | 29 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Anger | 56 % | 48 % | 50 % | 39 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Tension | 61 % | 36 % | 60 % | 54 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Tension | 71 % | 36 % | 65 % | 64 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Sadness | 75 % | 50 % | 53 % | 56 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 79′ | Anger | 70 % | 61 % | 39 % | 37 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 84′ | Anger | 61 % | 59 % | 37 % | 24 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 90′ | Anger | 57 % | 53 % | 39 % | 25 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 95′ | Sadness | 56 % | 49 % | 34 % | 33 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 101′ | Anger | 58 % | 51 % | 30 % | 33 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 106′ | Anger | 62 % | 57 % | 30 % | 30 % |
Cinderella
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Inside Job. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Kadri
Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Inside Job — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.
Premise onlyAfterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Self - Hedge Fund Manager
Self - Therapist
Self - Finance Minister, France
Self - Managing Director, Westwood Capital
Self - Special Investigative Committee, Icelandic Parliament
Self - Former Federal Reserve Chairman
Self - Managing Director, International Monetary Fund
Self - Chairman, Soros Fund Management
Self - Chairman, Financial Services Committee
Self - Chief Lobbyist, Financial Services Roundtable
Self - Chief Adviser, China Banking Regulatory Commission
Self - Prime Minister, Singapore
Self - U.S. Managing Editor, The Financial Times
Self - Professor, NYU Business School
Self - Chief Economic Adviser, Bush Administration
Self - Former Governor, New York
Self - Professor of Investment Banking, Harvard Business School
Details
- Directed by
- Charles Ferguson
- Written by
- Charles Ferguson, Chad Beck, Adam Bolt
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2010
- Runtime
- 109 min
- Country
- United States
- Genres
- Documentary, Crime
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





