feeldb

Genius

2016 · 104 min · Director: Michael Grandage ★ IMDb 6.5 · 22,960 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

When, one day in 1929, writer Thomas Wolfe decided to keep the appointment made by Max Perkins, editor at Scribner's, he had no illusions: his manuscript would be turned down as had invariably been the case. But, to his happy amazement, his novel, which was to become "Look Homeward, Angel," was accepted for publication. The only trouble was that it was overlong (by 300 pages) and had to be reduced. Although reluctant to see his poetic prose trimmed, Wolfe agreed and was helped by Perkins, who had become a true friend, with the result that it instantly became a favorite with the critics and a best seller. Success was even greater in 1935 when "Of Time and the River" appeared, but the fight for reducing Wolfe's logorrheic written expression had been even harder, with the novel originally at 5,000 pages. Perkins managed to cut 90,000 words from the book, and with bitterness ultimately taking its toll, the relationships between the two men gradually deteriorated. Wolfe did not feel grateful to Perkins any longer but had started resenting him for owing his success to him.

Trailer for Genius

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Genius (2016) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Curiosity 30%, Anxiety 25%, Empathy 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Curiosity, Anxiety, Empathy. Genres: Drama, Biography. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Curiosity, Anxiety and Empathy. Its IMDb rating of 6.5/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 67/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Sadness
  • Empathy
  • Joy

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Curiosity

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Dominant emotion: Joy

Dominant emotion: Empathy

Dominant emotion: Tension

Sadness
Empathy
Joy
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values. Not enough subtitle evidence
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 3 %, then peaks around 93 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensitySadnessEmpathyJoy
2.5 %≈ 3′Curiosity38 %20 %13 %5 %
7.5 %≈ 8′Sadness45 %21 %23 %21 %
12.5 %≈ 13′Joy54 %13 %30 %43 %
17.5 %≈ 18′Joy49 %11 %30 %43 %
22.5 %≈ 23′Joy48 %24 %40 %27 %
27.5 %≈ 29′Empathy55 %41 %54 %14 %
32.5 %≈ 34′Empathy54 %41 %49 %14 %
37.5 %≈ 39′Curiosity51 %32 %36 %18 %
42.5 %≈ 44′Tension53 %24 %29 %20 %
47.5 %≈ 49′Joy54 %17 %25 %26 %
52.5 %≈ 55′Tension57 %17 %28 %30 %
57.5 %≈ 60′Joy60 %24 %38 %34 %
62.5 %≈ 65′Sadness58 %38 %45 %26 %
67.5 %≈ 70′Sadness57 %41 %46 %11 %
72.5 %≈ 75′Tension65 %44 %48 %3 %
77.5 %≈ 81′Sadness68 %54 %54 %3 %
82.5 %≈ 86′Empathy69 %61 %63 %5 %
87.5 %≈ 91′Sadness79 %73 %71 %3 %
92.5 %≈ 96′Sadness87 %82 %77 %3 %
97.5 %≈ 101′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
Riches to rags

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

Jude Law

Thomas Wolfe

Laura Linney

Louise Saunders

Guy Pearce

F. Scott Fitzgerald

Dominic West

Ernest Hemingway

Vanessa Kirby

Zelda Fitzgerald

Demetri Goritsas

John Wheelock

HA
Harry Attwell

Assistant Editor

AS
Angela Sant'Albano

Bertha Perkins

EB
Eve Bracken

Zippy Perkins

GH
Gillian Hanna

Julia Wolfe

Corey Johnson

John Wheelock

MB
Miquel Brown

Eleanor, Perkins' Maid

RB
Rosy Benjamin

Scribner's Staff

EC
Elaine Caulfield

Mabel Wolfe

RD
Richard Dempsey

Director

KW
Katya Watson

Jane Perkins

LD
Lorna Doherty

Peggy Perkins

MM
Makenna McBrierty

Nancy Perkins

Details

Directed by
Michael Grandage
Written by
John Logan, A. Scott Berg
Type
Movies
Released
2016
Runtime
104 min
Country
United Kingdom, United States
Ratings
★ IMDb 6.5 · 22,960 ratings
Feels mostly
Curiosity
Data updated

Where to watch

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.