feeldb

Not Safe for Work

2014 · 75 min · Director: Joe Johnston ★ IMDb 5.8 · 5,187 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

The ambitious legal assistant Tom Miller works at the Rosen, Byres and Emmerich Attorneys at Law and secretly dates the gorgeous clerk Anna. His company has presently two major cases: Hartcourt vs. Denning Pharmaceutical, against a powerful corporation, and Gambizzi Case, against a mafia family. On the eve of the judgment of the Hartcourt case, Alan Emmerich releases all the employees early in the afternoon and he also fires Tom for snooping around the Gambizzi case. When Tom is leaving the building with Anna, he sees a man leaving a suitcase on the floor and another man wearing a suit taking the suitcase and going to the 34th floor of the building. Tom decides to follow him and soon he discovers that he man is actually a hit-man. Soon Tom is trapped on the floor with the killer since his access card is deactivated. Who hired the hit-man?

Ask Kadri

Trailer for Not Safe for Work

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Not Safe for Work (2014) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Tension 40%, Anxiety 25%, Excitement 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

  1. Fear10%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Tension, Anxiety, Excitement. Genres: Thriller. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Tension, Anxiety and Excitement. Its IMDb rating of 5.8/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 62/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Tension
  • Fear
  • Curiosity

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Tension

Dominant emotion: Curiosity

Dominant emotion: Relief

Dominant emotion: Surprise

Tension
Fear
Curiosity
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values. Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity peaks around 3 %, then dips around 33 %, then peaks around 73 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityTensionFearCuriosity
2.5 %≈ 2′Tension53 %50 %38 %37 %
7.5 %≈ 6′Curiosity39 %31 %21 %33 %
12.5 %≈ 9′Curiosity31 %18 %6 %26 %
17.5 %≈ 13′Relief36 %19 %3 %25 %
22.5 %≈ 17′Curiosity42 %27 %3 %32 %
27.5 %≈ 21′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
32.5 %≈ 24′Curiosity52 %52 %28 %45 %
37.5 %≈ 28′Tension61 %61 %43 %39 %
42.5 %≈ 32′Tension78 %78 %64 %32 %
47.5 %≈ 36′Tension80 %80 %64 %36 %
52.5 %≈ 39′Tension76 %76 %59 %41 %
57.5 %≈ 43′Tension81 %81 %69 %39 %
62.5 %≈ 47′Tension84 %84 %70 %49 %
67.5 %≈ 51′Tension85 %85 %70 %54 %
72.5 %≈ 54′Tension90 %90 %80 %40 %
77.5 %≈ 58′Tension90 %89 %77 %31 %
82.5 %≈ 62′Relief86 %83 %64 %39 %
87.5 %≈ 66′Surprise81 %78 %54 %54 %
92.5 %≈ 69′Tension73 %72 %47 %57 %
97.5 %≈ 73′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
Man in a hole

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about Not Safe for Work. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Not Safe for Work — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

MG
Michael Gladis

Max Minghella

Tom Miller

DB
Dan Bakkedahl

JJ Feild

Killer

TG
Tom Gallop

Roger

Christian Clemenson

Alan Emmerich

MG
Michael Gladis

Whistle Blower

Molly Hagan

Janine

MB
Marina Black

Lorraine Gambizzi

Tim Griffin

Hitman

FJ
Frankie J. Allison

Barney the Security Guard

Dan Bakkedahl

Random Denning Employee

AP
Alejandro Patiño

Fernando the Janitor

BK
Brandon Keener

Moyers, Junior Partner

EI
Eme Ikwuakor

Accomplice / Cop

JS
Jasper Salon

Businessman

CI
Christian Ijin Link

Businessman

JE
Julie Elizabeth Abeyta

Businesswoman

SH
Shashawnee Hall

Ray the Lobby Guard

KT
Kirk Torgerson

Alan Z. Emmerich's Assistant

MR
Michael Raif Brizzolara

Witness to John Ferguson's Suicide (uncredited)

Details

Directed by
Joe Johnston
Type
Movies
Released
2014
Runtime
75 min
Country
United States
Genres
Thriller
Ratings
★ IMDb 5.8 · 5,187 ratings
Feels mostly
Tension
Data updated

Where to watch

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.