I Give It a Year
2013 · 97 min · Director: Dan Mazer, Dan Mazer
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
After a seven month long passion-filled courtship, thirty-something Londoners Natasha Redford and Josh Moss get married despite they being mismatched in personality and temperament, something that their closest friends and family members can see - some who predict the marriage won't last a year - even if Nat and Josh themselves don't see it. Nat, a marketing company manager, is more professional and controlled. Josh, a novelist with a current case of writer's block, is more carefree and childlike. Nine months into their marriage, Nat and Josh have their first session with arguably the most distracted marriage counselor in the city, that session which may be the deciding factor in whether they continue in being husband and wife to each other. Their issues over the preceding nine months are told in flashback, and include little idiosyncrasies which annoy the other, and tensions with each's in-laws, beyond the general differences in their personalities. But what may be the biggest threat to a happily-ever-after for them as a couple may be temptations with others to who, at least on paper, each is more well suited. For Nat, that temptation is client Guy Harrap, an American manufacturer who, unknown to Nat, hired her firm solely in his personal attraction to her. For Josh, that temptation is his old girlfriend Chloe, an aide worker who only recently reentered his life after a four year stint away working in Africa, the two of them in theory never having really broken up in the first place.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
I Give It a Year (2013) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 30%, Love 25%, Smile 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor30%
- Love25%
- Smile20%
- Anticipation15%
- Satisfaction10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Love, Smile. Genres: Comedy, Romance. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Love and Smile. Its IMDb rating of 5.7/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 58/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Love
- Tension
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Love | Tension |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Humor | 58 % | 57 % | 29 % | 18 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Humor | 56 % | 54 % | 29 % | 23 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Humor | 54 % | 53 % | 19 % | 25 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 17′ | Humor | 52 % | 51 % | 10 % | 21 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 22′ | Humor | 49 % | 47 % | 10 % | 21 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Humor | 46 % | 40 % | 12 % | 29 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Humor | 46 % | 38 % | 15 % | 35 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 36′ | Humor | 50 % | 45 % | 14 % | 38 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 41′ | Humor | 55 % | 51 % | 15 % | 38 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 46′ | Humor | 57 % | 54 % | 25 % | 30 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Humor | 59 % | 57 % | 29 % | 29 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Humor | 60 % | 58 % | 19 % | 34 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Humor | 61 % | 59 % | 11 % | 34 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Humor | 55 % | 52 % | 13 % | 34 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Humor | 49 % | 38 % | 19 % | 38 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 75′ | Tension | 49 % | 33 % | 22 % | 37 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 80′ | Humor | 51 % | 41 % | 26 % | 29 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 85′ | Humor | 58 % | 53 % | 34 % | 30 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 90′ | Humor | 62 % | 58 % | 36 % | 30 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 95′ | Humor | 58 % | 57 % | 27 % | 22 % |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Kate
Clare
Alexandra
Janet
Preeta
Details
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2013
- Runtime
- 97 min
- Country
- United Kingdom, France, United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





