Love the Coopers
2015 · 107 min · Director: Jessie Nelson
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
When four generations of the Cooper clan come together for their annual Christmas Eve celebration, a series of unexpected visitors and unlikely events turn the night upside down, leading them all toward a surprising rediscovery of family bonds and the spirit of the holiday.
Emotional fingerprint
Love the Coopers (2015) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Empathy 30%, Humor 25%, Love 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Empathy, Humor, Love. Genres: Comedy, Romance, Fantasy. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Empathy, Humor and Love. Its IMDb rating of 5.8/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 59/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Sadness
- Love
- Humor
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Joy
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Sadness | Love | Humor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Humor | 37 % | 12 % | 22 % | 33 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Sadness | 40 % | 28 % | 23 % | 31 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Sadness | 43 % | 32 % | 20 % | 32 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Humor | 41 % | 25 % | 19 % | 36 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 24′ | Humor | 43 % | 30 % | 24 % | 39 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Sadness | 46 % | 41 % | 29 % | 38 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Sadness | 46 % | 44 % | 29 % | 31 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 40′ | Sadness | 45 % | 36 % | 29 % | 33 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Humor | 45 % | 24 % | 34 % | 40 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Love | 46 % | 25 % | 38 % | 39 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Sadness | 50 % | 41 % | 38 % | 31 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Sadness | 55 % | 50 % | 35 % | 26 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 67′ | Sadness | 53 % | 39 % | 28 % | 24 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 72′ | Joy | 44 % | 21 % | 23 % | 26 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Humor | 49 % | 28 % | 25 % | 29 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Tension | 61 % | 48 % | 29 % | 23 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Sadness | 63 % | 55 % | 34 % | 20 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 94′ | Sadness | 61 % | 44 % | 45 % | 28 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 99′ | Joy | 60 % | 21 % | 54 % | 33 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 104′ | Love | 55 % | 10 % | 53 % | 30 % |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Madison Cooper
Jake
Mrs. Pinkins
Bob
Details
- Directed by
- Jessie Nelson
- Written by
- Steven Rogers
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2015
- Runtime
- 107 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Empathy
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
