The Conspiracy
2012 · 85 min · Director: Christopher MacBride
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Becoming the documentary itself, the changing nature of friends Aaron and Jim's latest documentary film is presented. The original subject of the documentary was the bizarre world of conspiracy theorists, most specifically one named Terrance G., not the actual content of the video which came their way of one his old fashioned soapbox styled street-side rants that intrigued them, but rather the fact of the number of comments to the video supporting his theories that did. In addition to their interviews with Terrance, much of that original documentary included interviews with a female psychologist talking about the mental state of someone like Terrance. The nature of the documentary changed when Terrance went missing without a trace midway through their filming. During Aaron and Jim's online search in trying to figure out what may have happened to Terrance, they thinking something nefarious, Aaron, in the process beginning to believe many of the theories Terrance espoused, stumbles across a story/theory that a secret organization called the Tarsus Group, comprised solely of powerful white men, is in the process of creating and controlling a new world order. As such, they have to discover not only if the Tarsus Group truly does exist, but if it does whether they are doing what is purported, namely taking over the world.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
The Conspiracy (2012) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Confusion 30%, Anxiety 25%, Tension 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Confusion, Anxiety, Tension. Genres: Thriller, Horror. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Confusion, Anxiety and Tension. Its IMDb rating of 6.2/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 64/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Anxiety
- Fear
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Fear
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Anxiety | Fear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Curiosity | 49 % | 25 % | 18 % | 10 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 6′ | Curiosity | 53 % | 32 % | 26 % | 15 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Curiosity | 54 % | 39 % | 30 % | 18 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Curiosity | 50 % | 35 % | 27 % | 16 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Curiosity | 52 % | 35 % | 28 % | 15 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Curiosity | 58 % | 39 % | 30 % | 17 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Curiosity | 59 % | 41 % | 30 % | 17 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Curiosity | 61 % | 47 % | 38 % | 23 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 36′ | Curiosity | 63 % | 51 % | 42 % | 27 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 40′ | Curiosity | 65 % | 54 % | 45 % | 31 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Tension | 71 % | 65 % | 57 % | 40 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 49′ | Tension | 71 % | 70 % | 62 % | 43 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Tension | 69 % | 69 % | 58 % | 39 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Tension | 68 % | 69 % | 57 % | 36 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Tension | 71 % | 72 % | 61 % | 44 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 66′ | Tension | 81 % | 81 % | 73 % | 63 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Tension | 89 % | 88 % | 83 % | 77 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Fear | 93 % | 89 % | 82 % | 86 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 79′ | Disturbing | 93 % | 85 % | 77 % | 88 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about The Conspiracy. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Kadri
Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about The Conspiracy — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.
Premise onlyAfterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Jim's Friend
Self
Mark Tucker
Dame
Guard
Ron
Landlady
Robert Williams
Kevin
Tracy
Details
- Directed by
- Christopher MacBride
- Written by
- Christopher MacBride
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2012
- Runtime
- 85 min
- Country
- Canada
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Confusion
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Free
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.




