Stories We Tell
2012 · 109 min · Director: Sarah Polley
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
In this inspired, genre-twisting new film, Oscar®-nominated writer/director Sarah Polley discovers that the truth depends on who's telling it. Polley is both filmmaker and detective as she investigates the secrets kept by a family of storytellers. She playfully interviews and interrogates a cast of characters of varying reliability, eliciting refreshingly candid, yet mostly contradictory, answers to the same questions. As each relates their version of the family mythology, present-day recollections shift into nostalgia-tinged glimpses of their mother, who departed too soon, leaving a trail of unanswered questions. Polley unravels the paradoxes to reveal the essence of family: always complicated, warmly messy and fiercely loving. Stories We Tell explores the elusive nature of truth and memory, but at its core is a deeply personal film about how our narratives shape and define us as individuals and families, all interconnecting to paint a profound, funny and poignant picture of the larger human story.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Stories We Tell (2012) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Curiosity 30%, Nostalgia 25%, Empathy 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Curiosity, Nostalgia, Empathy. Genres: Documentary. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Curiosity, Nostalgia and Empathy. Its IMDb rating of 7.5/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 73/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Empathy
- Sadness
- Curiosity
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Empathy | Sadness | Curiosity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Curiosity | 48 % | 18 % | 10 % | 47 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Humor | 50 % | 26 % | 14 % | 45 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 14′ | Humor | 49 % | 38 % | 23 % | 40 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Empathy | 50 % | 45 % | 33 % | 39 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 25′ | Sadness | 57 % | 53 % | 46 % | 41 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 30′ | Sadness | 64 % | 56 % | 53 % | 49 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Curiosity | 63 % | 46 % | 36 % | 61 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 41′ | Curiosity | 59 % | 40 % | 24 % | 63 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 46′ | Empathy | 63 % | 54 % | 41 % | 48 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 52′ | Sadness | 70 % | 66 % | 61 % | 39 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Sadness | 73 % | 61 % | 51 % | 48 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Love | 74 % | 56 % | 36 % | 53 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Empathy | 73 % | 63 % | 40 % | 48 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Empathy | 66 % | 64 % | 44 % | 48 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 79′ | Sadness | 60 % | 51 % | 36 % | 53 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 84′ | Curiosity | 60 % | 46 % | 31 % | 54 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 90′ | Empathy | 68 % | 60 % | 49 % | 44 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 95′ | Sadness | 74 % | 69 % | 63 % | 31 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 101′ | Love | 73 % | 65 % | 53 % | 28 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 106′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Oedipus
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Stories We Tell. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Kadri
Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Stories We Tell — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.
Premise onlyAfterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Storyteller
Storyteller
Storyteller
Storyteller
Storyteller
Storyteller
Storyteller
Storyteller
Storyteller
Storyteller
Storyteller
Storyteller
Storyteller
Diane Polley
Michael Polley
Harry Gulkin
Details
- Directed by
- Sarah Polley
- Written by
- Sarah Polley, Michael Polley
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2012
- Runtime
- 109 min
- Country
- Canada
- Genres
- Documentary
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Curiosity
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Free
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.



