Assault on Wall Street
2013 · 99 min · Director: Uwe Boll
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Jim is an average New Yorker living a peaceful life with a well paying job and a loving family. Suddenly, everything changes when the economy crashes causing Jim to lose everything. Filled with anger and rage, Jim snaps and goes to extreme lengths to seek revenge for the life taken from him.
Emotional fingerprint
Assault on Wall Street (2013) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Anger 35%, Anxiety 25%, Sadness 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Anger, Anxiety, Sadness. Genres: Thriller, Action. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Anger, Anxiety and Sadness. Its IMDb rating of 6.0/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 62/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Sympathy
- Sadness
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Sympathy
Dominant emotion: Anger
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Sympathy | Sadness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Tension | 51 % | 44 % | 29 % | 18 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Sympathy | 54 % | 43 % | 45 % | 27 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Sympathy | 48 % | 35 % | 46 % | 29 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 17′ | Sympathy | 44 % | 35 % | 40 % | 28 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 22′ | Sympathy | 55 % | 45 % | 50 % | 35 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Sympathy | 62 % | 51 % | 57 % | 38 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Anger | 66 % | 52 % | 60 % | 40 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 37′ | Sympathy | 73 % | 54 % | 69 % | 54 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 42′ | Sympathy | 71 % | 55 % | 69 % | 57 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 47′ | Sympathy | 67 % | 48 % | 64 % | 57 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 52′ | Sadness | 72 % | 42 % | 67 % | 66 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Sympathy | 69 % | 39 % | 64 % | 61 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Sympathy | 65 % | 46 % | 57 % | 50 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 67′ | Tension | 69 % | 60 % | 51 % | 46 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 72′ | Tension | 70 % | 66 % | 39 % | 39 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 77′ | Tension | 63 % | 60 % | 28 % | 27 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 82′ | Tension | 63 % | 61 % | 30 % | 20 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Tension | 81 % | 79 % | 38 % | 22 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 92′ | Tension | 91 % | 87 % | 33 % | 21 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 97′ | Disturbing | 90 % | 82 % | 23 % | 21 % |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Reporter
Mary Jean
Nate
Gus
Insurance Agent
Details
Where to watch
Free
Also on
Availability varies by country
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
