feeldb

The Challenger Disaster

2013 · 90 min · Director: James Hawes ★ IMDb 7.2 · 4,781 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

When Challenger disintegrated 73 seconds into its flight on the morning of 28 January 1986, it represented one of the most shocking events in the history of American spaceflight. A Presidential Commission was immediately convened to explore what had gone wrong, but with the vast complexity of the space shuttle and so many vested interests involved in the investigation, discovering the truth presented an almost impossible challenge. A truly independent member of the investigation was Richard Feynman. One of the most accomplished scientists of his generation, he worked on the Manhattan Project building the first atom bomb and won the Nobel Prize for his breakthroughs in quantum physics. Feynman deployed exceptional integrity, charm and relentless scientific logic to investigate the secrets of the Shuttle disaster and in doing so, helped make the US Space Programme safer.

Ask Kadri

Trailer for The Challenger Disaster

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

The Challenger Disaster (2013) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Anxiety 35%, Empathy 25%, Sadness 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Anxiety, Empathy, Sadness. Genres: Drama, History. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Anxiety, Empathy and Sadness. Its IMDb rating of 7.2/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 72/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Curiosity
  • Tension
  • Sadness

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Curiosity

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Dominant emotion: Tension

Dominant emotion: Empathy

Dominant emotion: Satisfaction

Curiosity
Tension
Sadness
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values.
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 3 %, then dips around 18 %, then peaks around 57 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityCuriosityTensionSadness
2.5 %≈ 2′Curiosity58 %42 %32 %27 %
7.5 %≈ 7′Sadness65 %40 %44 %44 %
12.5 %≈ 11′Curiosity56 %45 %40 %29 %
17.5 %≈ 16′Curiosity50 %54 %35 %14 %
22.5 %≈ 20′Curiosity55 %55 %40 %30 %
27.5 %≈ 25′Sadness57 %53 %41 %36 %
32.5 %≈ 29′Curiosity58 %57 %43 %20 %
37.5 %≈ 34′Curiosity57 %64 %45 %13 %
42.5 %≈ 38′Curiosity59 %64 %45 %23 %
47.5 %≈ 43′Curiosity64 %61 %49 %43 %
52.5 %≈ 47′Sadness71 %61 %57 %55 %
57.5 %≈ 52′Tension74 %63 %66 %43 %
62.5 %≈ 56′Tension70 %64 %68 %25 %
67.5 %≈ 61′Curiosity69 %63 %66 %26 %
72.5 %≈ 65′Tension72 %51 %63 %44 %
77.5 %≈ 70′Empathy73 %44 %55 %52 %
82.5 %≈ 74′Tension68 %53 %60 %37 %
87.5 %≈ 79′Tension69 %63 %65 %24 %
92.5 %≈ 83′Satisfaction73 %53 %46 %30 %
97.5 %≈ 88′Satisfaction72 %32 %23 %42 %
Man in a hole

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about The Challenger Disaster. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about The Challenger Disaster — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

William Hurt

Richard Feynman

EB
Eve Best

EB
Eve Best

Sally Ride

Kevin McNally

Lawrence Mulloy

Henry Goodman

Dr. Weiss

LK
Langley Kirkwood

Avionics Engineer

NB
Nick Boraine

SRB Engineer

MY
Meganne Young

Michelle Feynman

Danny Keogh

Head Of Recovery

SC
Sean Cameron Michael

Judson Lovingood

Robert Hobbs

Allan J. Macdonald

Stephen Jennings

Neil Armstrong

NP
Nicholas Pauling

Bill Graham

AN
Adam Neill

Blade Engineer

SM
Stevel Marc

Taxi Driver

GH
Graham Hopkins

Reporter #1

DP
Dana Prophet

Reporter #2

CB
Clayton Boyd

Reporter #3

Details

Directed by
James Hawes
Written by
Kate Gartside
Type
Movies
Released
2013
Runtime
90 min
Country
United Kingdom, United States
Genres
Drama, History
Ratings
★ IMDb 7.2 · 4,781 ratings
Feels mostly
Anxiety
Data updated

Where to watch

Also on

Availability varies by country

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.