Posthumous
2014 · 94 min · Director: Lulu Wang
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
After false reports of his demise put him and his work on the map, an artist decides to continue the charade by posing as his own brother. Soon, a reporter enters his life and has a profound effect on him.
Emotional fingerprint
Posthumous (2014) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 28%, Love 25%, Anxiety 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor28%
- Love25%
- Anxiety20%
- Surprise15%
- Satisfaction12%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Love, Anxiety. Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Love and Anxiety. Its IMDb rating of 5.7/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 60/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Curiosity
- Sadness
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Curiosity | Sadness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Curiosity | 42 % | 28 % | 40 % | 18 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Sadness | 45 % | 31 % | 40 % | 27 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Humor | 51 % | 43 % | 43 % | 26 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Humor | 56 % | 50 % | 48 % | 15 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Curiosity | 58 % | 49 % | 48 % | 9 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 26′ | Humor | 54 % | 44 % | 43 % | 8 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 31′ | Curiosity | 46 % | 35 % | 41 % | 13 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Curiosity | 44 % | 30 % | 43 % | 23 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 40′ | Curiosity | 46 % | 30 % | 43 % | 30 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Curiosity | 48 % | 31 % | 39 % | 29 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 49′ | Love | 48 % | 30 % | 32 % | 24 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 54′ | Love | 53 % | 29 % | 29 % | 24 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 59′ | Love | 56 % | 30 % | 24 % | 25 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Love | 55 % | 21 % | 25 % | 30 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Tension | 63 % | 11 % | 33 % | 40 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Tension | 70 % | 14 % | 34 % | 50 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Sadness | 64 % | 16 % | 31 % | 53 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 82′ | Sadness | 59 % | 24 % | 30 % | 38 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Love | 63 % | 40 % | 32 % | 20 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 92′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Posthumous. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Landlord
Curator 2
Arman Rubell
Galerist
Camille Seekamp
Curator 1
Detective
Waiter
Hostess
Magistrate
Cop 2
Randy
Shannon
Gallerist 1
Details
- Directed by
- Lulu Wang
- Written by
- Lulu Wang
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2014
- Runtime
- 94 min
- Country
- United States, Germany
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
