feeldb

Stockholm, Pennsylvania

2015 · 99 min · Director: Nikole Beckwith ★ IMDb 6 · 2,834 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

Seventeen years after she was abducted by a stranger named Benjamin McKay (Jason Isaacs), twenty-three-year-old Leanne Dargon (Saoirse Ronan), who has been in his captivity all this time, is discovered, and eventually reunited with her biological parents, Marcy (Cynthia Nixon) and Glen Dargon (David Warshofsky), while Ben is now in prison charged with her kidnapping. Ben was able to hide her locked in his basement all of this time, telling her that he saved her from world destruction, which she would have no reason not to believe. Leanne has no true recollection of her time before Ben, who renamed her "Leia", and thus is the only family she has ever known. Over those seventeen years, Marcy and Glen dealt with the abduction in different ways, Marcy, whose primary focus was and still is Leanne, to the point of never having returned to work. Marcy, Glen, and Leia enter into their reunion with this history. So while Marcy and Glen have a memory of their six-year-old daughter who they want back in a young adult form, Leia only sees in front of her two strangers. Their parent/offspring relationship is thus formal and strained at best. But it takes a turn when Marcy discovers just how much of an attachment Leia still has to Ben, who Marcy only sees as the man who destroyed their family. Marcy goes to extreme measures to get back the "Leanne" she so desperately wants, at the possible expense of everything else in her life.

Ask Kadri

Trailer for Stockholm, Pennsylvania

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Stockholm, Pennsylvania (2015) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Empathy 30%, Anxiety 25%, Sadness 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Empathy, Anxiety, Sadness. Genres: Thriller, Drama. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Empathy, Anxiety and Sadness. Its IMDb rating of 6.0/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 62/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Sadness
  • Empathy
  • Disturbing

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Empathy

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Dominant emotion: Disturbing

Dominant emotion: Tension

Sadness
Empathy
Disturbing
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values.
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 8 %, then dips around 33 %, then peaks around 88 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensitySadnessEmpathyDisturbing
2.5 %≈ 2′Empathy50 %35 %50 %18 %
7.5 %≈ 7′Sadness49 %38 %49 %19 %
12.5 %≈ 12′Empathy49 %36 %49 %24 %
17.5 %≈ 17′Empathy55 %36 %51 %38 %
22.5 %≈ 22′Disturbing56 %34 %49 %44 %
27.5 %≈ 27′Empathy49 %30 %45 %29 %
32.5 %≈ 32′Empathy49 %34 %49 %26 %
37.5 %≈ 37′Empathy56 %43 %54 %39 %
42.5 %≈ 42′Sadness66 %53 %58 %49 %
47.5 %≈ 47′Disturbing76 %63 %64 %64 %
52.5 %≈ 52′Sadness79 %64 %64 %68 %
57.5 %≈ 57′Tension75 %57 %56 %59 %
62.5 %≈ 62′Sadness76 %59 %57 %64 %
67.5 %≈ 67′Disturbing84 %61 %65 %80 %
72.5 %≈ 72′Disturbing83 %59 %63 %80 %
77.5 %≈ 77′Tension78 %56 %57 %73 %
82.5 %≈ 82′Disturbing81 %60 %65 %79 %
87.5 %≈ 87′Disturbing85 %70 %75 %85 %
92.5 %≈ 92′Disturbing84 %75 %77 %80 %
97.5 %≈ 97′Sadness82 %75 %78 %72 %
Riches to rags

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about Stockholm, Pennsylvania. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Stockholm, Pennsylvania — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

Saoirse Ronan

Leia Dargon

David Warshofsky

Glen Dargon

AP
Avery Phillips

Leia Dargon (Age 7)

HH
Hana Hayes

Leia Dargon (Age 12)

Rosalind Chao

Dr. Andrews

Tom Wright

Detective Timms

JT
Jayne Taini

Grocery Store Woman

JF
Juan Fernandez

Reporter

MA
Michelle Alegria

News Anchor

RY
Rob Yang

Mr. Henry

WB
Wiley B. Oscar

Prison Officer

NM
Nelson Mashita

Public Defender

GG
Gordon Greene

Ben’s Neighbor

JP
Jennifer Perito

911 Operator (voice)

Details

Directed by
Nikole Beckwith
Written by
Nikole Beckwith
Type
Movies
Released
2015
Runtime
99 min
Country
United States
Ratings
★ IMDb 6 · 2,834 ratings
Feels mostly
Empathy
Data updated

Where to watch

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.