26 Years
2012 · 135 min · Director: Geun-hyun Cho, Jo Geun-Hyeon, Cho Keun-Hyun
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
26 years ago, state troops were ordered to open fire on civilians in the city of Gwangju who were demonstrating as apart of a democratic movement. Thousands of civilians were killed. Now, a shooter from the national team, a gang member, a policeman, CEO from a large company and director of a private security outfit get involved in a plan to convict the person responsible for the massacre that occurred during the Gwangju Democratization Movement. Kwak Jin-Bae (Jin Goo) is a gang member who lost his father in the Gwangju Democratization Movement. He wants to get revenge. Shim Mi-Jin (Han Hye-Jin) is a shooter from the national team. She is the shooter for the covert team. Policeman Kwon Jung-Kyuk (Im Seul-Ong) lost his family in the Gwangju Democratization Movement. He is now responsible for the cars that have access to the ex-president's house.
Emotional fingerprint
26 Years (2012) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Empathy 30%, Anger 25%, Sadness 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Empathy30%
- Anger25%
- Sadness20%
- Tension15%
- Inspiration10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Empathy, Anger, Sadness. Genres: Thriller, Drama, Crime. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Empathy, Anger and Sadness. Its IMDb rating of 6.2/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 64/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Empathy
- Sadness
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Anger
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Empathy | Sadness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Tension | 83 % | 67 % | 72 % | 73 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 10′ | Sadness | 80 % | 55 % | 68 % | 71 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 17′ | Anger | 70 % | 51 % | 52 % | 56 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 24′ | Tension | 61 % | 53 % | 45 % | 44 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 30′ | Empathy | 55 % | 48 % | 44 % | 38 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 37′ | Tension | 54 % | 49 % | 40 % | 32 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Tension | 57 % | 55 % | 38 % | 29 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Tension | 68 % | 64 % | 46 % | 35 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Tension | 80 % | 76 % | 59 % | 44 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 64′ | Tension | 78 % | 75 % | 55 % | 38 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Anger | 64 % | 57 % | 48 % | 31 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Empathy | 60 % | 49 % | 54 % | 40 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 84′ | Empathy | 63 % | 54 % | 51 % | 39 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 91′ | Tension | 69 % | 66 % | 41 % | 28 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 98′ | Tension | 81 % | 81 % | 46 % | 31 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 105′ | Tension | 88 % | 88 % | 56 % | 40 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 111′ | Tension | 89 % | 89 % | 66 % | 51 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 118′ | Tension | 92 % | 92 % | 75 % | 65 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 125′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 132′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Icarus
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about 26 Years. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Gwon Jeong-hyeok
Kim Ju-an
Rookie Police Officer
Big Guardian #3
Big Guardian #4
Details
- Directed by
- Geun-hyun Cho, Jo Geun-Hyeon, Cho Keun-Hyun
- Written by
- Lee Hae-young, Kang Full, Jo Geun-Hyeon
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2012
- Runtime
- 135 min
- Country
- South Korea
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Empathy
- Data updated
Where to watch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
