feeldb

Oh Christmas Tree!

2013 · 87 min · Director: Craig Pryce ★ IMDb 6.3 · 2,722 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

Elise MacReynolds is no fan of Christmas. Growing up on a tree farm meant every holiday was spent selling Christmas trees on a cold street corner. But when she loses her job and her dad breaks his leg, Elise agrees to run the family tree stand for one last season. Unfortunately for Elise, the family business that has always hosted the MacReynolds' Farms tree lot has been acquired by home decor conglomerate Brook Glen Elise gets off on the wrong foot with surly Brook Glen CEO Gary Dixon when she almost knocks him down while unloading a big tree. Gary thinks the trees are horrible for business and sets in motion a plan to get rid of the lot, for good. Despite her battles with Gary, Elise finds herself catching the holiday spirit as she helps the denizens of NYC find their one perfect tree: Everyone from a baby-on-the-way couple, to a professional basketball team, to a young boy picking out his first tree. Christmas also proves to be the season for romance when charming repeat customer Darren admits he's been buying trees simply in the hopes of talking to Elise. But when Gary convinces the NYFD to impound the trees and shut down the lot, Elise must find a way to crack his scrooge exterior and make up for lost time. Can Elise pull off a Christmas Eve miracle in time to save the family business? With help from her new beau, family, friends and customers, and a little holiday magic, she just may have a shot.

Ask Kadri

Trailer for Oh Christmas Tree!

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Oh Christmas Tree! (2013) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Happiness 35%, Love 20%, Humor 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

20%Love
20%Humor
  1. Love20%
  2. Humor20%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Happiness, Love, Humor. Genres: Comedy, Romance, Family. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Happiness, Love and Humor. Its IMDb rating of 6.3/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 65/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Love
  • Joy
  • Humor

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Humor

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Dominant emotion: Tension

Dominant emotion: Joy

Dominant emotion: Love

Love
Joy
Humor
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values.
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 3 %, then peaks around 98 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityLoveJoyHumor
2.5 %≈ 2′Humor40 %7 %9 %37 %
7.5 %≈ 7′Sadness45 %11 %6 %35 %
12.5 %≈ 11′Humor46 %14 %6 %35 %
17.5 %≈ 15′Tension44 %13 %8 %36 %
22.5 %≈ 20′Humor41 %16 %14 %38 %
27.5 %≈ 24′Humor41 %21 %24 %35 %
32.5 %≈ 28′Joy46 %26 %34 %40 %
37.5 %≈ 33′Humor53 %38 %39 %48 %
42.5 %≈ 37′Love53 %46 %35 %40 %
47.5 %≈ 41′Love46 %39 %25 %32 %
52.5 %≈ 46′Humor44 %28 %26 %39 %
57.5 %≈ 50′Humor46 %33 %35 %41 %
62.5 %≈ 54′Love46 %44 %36 %34 %
67.5 %≈ 59′Love50 %39 %30 %29 %
72.5 %≈ 63′Tension59 %26 %18 %21 %
77.5 %≈ 67′Sadness61 %29 %8 %14 %
82.5 %≈ 72′Sadness64 %36 %20 %14 %
87.5 %≈ 76′Joy71 %43 %53 %21 %
92.5 %≈ 80′Joy76 %59 %73 %32 %
97.5 %≈ 85′Love78 %73 %75 %38 %
Cinderella

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about Oh Christmas Tree!. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Oh Christmas Tree! — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

SL
Sarah Lancaster

SL
Sarah Lancaster

Elise

Eric Johnson

Darren

CM
Colin Mochrie

CM
Colin Mochrie

Gary

GA
Gregory Ambrose Calderone

Shane

IC
Inga Cadranel

Nanci

LG
Lynne Griffin

Betty

DM
Derek McGrath

Hank

JB
John Bregar

Lance

MB
Marqus Bobesich

Bob

SM
Siobhan Murphy

Maria

JG
Jeff Geddis

Josh

DS
Danny Smith

Miguel

Martin Roach

Malcolm

KJ
Kevin Jubinville

Fleet Executive

NS
Naomi Sniekus

Marge

JM
Justin Mader

Father

EN
Evan Nemes

Ben

DP
Dina Pino

Mother

DA
Dwayne Adams

Customer #1

Details

Directed by
Craig Pryce
Type
Movies
Released
2013
Runtime
87 min
Country
Canada
Ratings
★ IMDb 6.3 · 2,722 ratings
Feels mostly
Happiness
Data updated

Where to watch

Also on

Availability varies by country

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.