Kill Command
2016 · 99 min · Director: Steven Gomez
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Set in a near future, technology-reliant society is creating killing machines. Against this backdrop an elite Marine unit is helicoptered in to a remote, off-the-grid island training facility, to test the capabilities of the latest prototypes. They set up positions and make short work of the AI targets in the killing field. However, overnight their sentry goes missing, and when they find the corpse the next day they find themselves in the killing field and the tables have turned. The Marines fight to survive on an island that is overrun by an enemy intelligence far beyond their predecessors, which learns from their every move.
Emotional fingerprint
Kill Command (2016) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Tension 35%, Fear 25%, Excitement 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Tension35%
- Fear25%
- Excitement20%
- Anxiety15%
- Relief5%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Tension, Fear, Excitement. Genres: Action, Horror, Sci-Fi. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Tension, Fear and Excitement. Its IMDb rating of 5.7/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 60/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Fear
- Curiosity
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Fear | Curiosity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Curiosity | 38 % | 18 % | 3 % | 42 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Humor | 38 % | 21 % | 4 % | 34 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Curiosity | 39 % | 30 % | 8 % | 34 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 17′ | Curiosity | 41 % | 37 % | 10 % | 34 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 22′ | Tension | 43 % | 36 % | 9 % | 29 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Humor | 50 % | 40 % | 19 % | 35 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Tension | 68 % | 63 % | 48 % | 40 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 37′ | Tension | 76 % | 76 % | 64 % | 41 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 42′ | Tension | 69 % | 68 % | 51 % | 51 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 47′ | Curiosity | 68 % | 65 % | 49 % | 50 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 52′ | Tension | 78 % | 73 % | 59 % | 45 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Sadness | 77 % | 70 % | 50 % | 52 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Tension | 75 % | 71 % | 48 % | 60 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 67′ | Tension | 79 % | 79 % | 59 % | 57 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 72′ | Tension | 80 % | 80 % | 63 % | 44 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 77′ | Tension | 84 % | 84 % | 68 % | 30 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 82′ | Tension | 88 % | 88 % | 74 % | 30 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Tension | 87 % | 87 % | 73 % | 42 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 92′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 97′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Cutbill
Laboratory Technician
Robinson
Loftus
Hackett
Winder
Details
- Directed by
- Steven Gomez
- Written by
- Steven Gomez
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2016
- Runtime
- 99 min
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Tension
- Data updated
Where to watch
Free
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
